Calvinism
is more than a system of five points. It is a way of doing theology that
emphasises the sovereignty of God at every point in the system of dogmatics.
The five points of Calvinism summarised by the acronym TULIP (total depravity,
unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace, and the
perseverance of the saints) were originally written in response to the five
points of the Remonstrants. This was a Protestant movement that spilt from the
Dutch Reformed Church in the early seventeenth century, and which was roundly condemned
by the Synod of Dort in 1618/19. Although popularly known as Calvinism, the
movement was greater than John Calvin (1509–64) himself who was simply one of
many Reformed theologians during the early modern period. Scholars prefer to
use the term ‘Reformed’ to capture the essence of this broader
socio-theological movement, though many still use the word ‘Calvinism’ as a
convenient shorthand for summarising Reformed theology. Many opponents of
Calvinism are often unaware of the history of Calvinism, the meaning of the
term, and the development of Reformed doctrine since the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries. Calvin is sometimes viewed by both opponents and
sympathisers as the sole arbiter of what constitutes Reformed theology. This is
clearly a mistake. Calvinism should be considered holistically with its many
permutations and forms, and the voices of a broad spectrum of Reformed
theologians should also be carefully considered and studied along with Calvin.
This essay will explore the history and definition of Calvinism, it will seek
to defend the so-called five points of Calvinism from critics, and it will
document Calvinism by considering key works within the Calvinistic canon of
literature such as The Decades of Heinrich Bullinger (published
from 1849–52) and The Institutes of Elenctic Theology (published
from 1679–85) by Francis Turretin.
A. Defining Historic Calvinism
Calvinism
is a theological worldview that emphasises the sovereignty of God in the work
of redemption. It has its origins with the Protestant Reformer John Calvin
(1509–1564) who was born in Noyon, France and trained in law and the humanities.
He was converted around 1533 and adopted the ideology of the Protestant
Reformation. This was when he formally broke his ties with Roman Catholicism.
He is famous for the publication of his Institutes of the Christian Religion
(1536) which he continually revised until 1559 when the definitive edition was
published in Latin. This is a seminal theological work which explores the major
themes in dogmatic or systematic theology. Calvin is also known for his
pastoral leadership in Geneva during the sixteenth century. He was invited by
William Farel (1489–1565) to bring Reformation thought and discipline to
Geneva, and though he was expelled for a brief period in 1541, he returned and
lived in Geneva for the duration of his life. He worked tirelessly to reform
the Genevan church and government according to Protestant principles and to
make Geneva a model of Reformed society for the European world. Notoriously, he
condemned the heretic Michael Servetus to death in 1553 for his rejection of
the orthodox doctrine of the Holy Trinity in his published writings, especially
his De Trinitatis Erroribus (1531) in which Servetus argued that the
doctrine of the Holy Trinity was a philosophical distortion of Biblical
monotheism. As already mentioned, Calvin published his final edition of the Institutes
in 1559 and founded the Geneva Academy for training pastors and preachers in
Reformed theology whom he would send as missionaries and preachers around the
known world. Though Calvin remains a seminal thinker in the development of
Reformed theology, he was not the only person of significance in the history of
Calvinism despite his considerable fame and association with Reformed theology.
He was a human being with feet of clay.
Calvinism itself has its origins in
late patristic theology, especially in the pre-Calvinistic movement known as
Augustinianism – named after the theology of St Augustine (354–430 AD). Many of
the hot topics debated during the Reformation such as predestination,
reprobation, and divine election had already been considered during the
Pelagian controversy during the Patristic era. Calvinism was essentially the
revival or retrieval of Augustinianism in early modern Europe. Pelagianism was
a movement that placed all the onus on humanity to redeem itself through
personal merit, while Augustinianism emphasized the futility of human merit and
prioritised sovereign grace as the proper way of salvation. St Augustine was
known as the ‘doctor of grace’. Salvation was seen to be wholly and totally a
work of God, and to have nothing to do with human merit. Calvinism is something
of a misnomer. The movement did not belong to John Calvin alone. There were
many others in the Reformed theological tradition at the time such as Huldrych
Zwingli (1484–1531), Heinrich Bullinger (1504–75), Peter Martyr Vermigli
(1499–1562), Theodore Beza (1519–1605), Katharina Schutz Zell (1497/8–1562),
Thomas Cranmer (1489–1556), and Richard Hooker (1554–1600), to name just a few.
The term ‘Calvinism’ is sometimes used
to refer specifically to aspects of Calvin’s personal theology such as his view
of the spiritual presence of Christ in the elements of Holy Eucharist. However,
the term Calvinism is primarily used to refer to the Reformed tradition in
general and to the theology of the many Reformed theologians who followed in
Calvin’s footsteps. Calvin and his successors built upon the work of Martin Luther
(1483–1546). They adopted his doctrine of justification by faith alone and
emphasised the sovereign system of salvation by grace alone, with a particular
focus on the doctrine of election and divine predestination. Calvin himself
wrote a seminal textbook for Reformation theology in his masterpiece The
Institutes of the Christian Religion in 1536. It would go through several
editions and formats until finally completed in the Latin edition of 1559 and
the French edition of 1560. Though Calvinism is something of a misnomer, and
scholars generally prefer to use the term ‘Reformed’ or ‘Reformed tradition’,
its use is retained in this paper as a shorthand for Reformed theology and the
Reformed tradition in general, especially as it found expression following the
Synod of Dort in 1618/19.
The so-called ‘five points of
Calvinism’ were actually written in response to five points put forward by the
followers of Jacob Arminius (1560–1609) to the Synod of Dort in 1618/19. These
followers were known as Remonstrants who protested against the system devised
by Calvin and his successors in the Reformed tradition. The Synod of Dort was a
significant and historic church council in which the theology of Jacob Arminius
and his followers was robustly and definitively condemned. The Reformed
theologians at the synod put forward five counterpoints to those of the
Remonstrants. These would eventually become known as the five points of
Calvinism, though it was not until the twentieth century that the acronym TULIP
would be adopted. The theology of the Remonstrants was built upon the ideas of
human freedom and ability, sometimes termed ‘free will’. Election was
conditional upon faith. The atonement was universal in extent. Grace was seen
to be resistible, and the believer was liable to fall away from salvation if he
or she did not persist in grace and holiness. The Reformers responded with five
points of their own in the Canons of Dort which are nowadays summarised by the
acronym TULIP: total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement,
irresistible grace, and the perseverance of the saints. The Reformers argued
that human beings were spiritually dead in trespasses and sins and that the
human will was in bondage to sin. They argued that election was unconditional
and not based upon any foreseen merit. In other words, God chose those whom he
would save freely by his sovereign grace. The atonement was limited or
particular to the elect only, meaning that Christ died for his sheep
exclusively and made their salvation fully effective. God effectually calls and applies salvation to the elect alone by the Holy
Spirit. True believers can never lose their salvation since they have eternal
security in Christ. While TULIP is a useful aid to memory, it should not
prevent us from accepting better theological terms describing the points made
in the Canons of Dort. For example, it is generally preferable to speak of
‘effectual calling’ rather than irresistible grace, and to speak of ‘particular
redemption’ rather than limited atonement.
Calvinism spread across Europe during
the sixteenth and seventeenth century and gradually developed a more scholastic
and elenctic form. In France, followers of John Calvin were known as the
Huguenots and faced considerable persecution, especially on St. Bartholomew’s
Day Massacre in 1572. In the Netherlands, Calvinism become heavily influential
in the Dutch Reformed tradition and found expression in the confessional
documents known as The Three Forms of Unity (The Belgic Confession, The Heidelberg
Catechism, and the Canons of Dort). John Knox (c. 1514–72) famously brought
Calvinist theology to Scotland and founded churches with a Presbyterian form of
church government modelled on the pattern in Geneva. Calvinism spread through
England and Wales largely through the influence of Puritanism. This period is often
referred to as the confessional development of the Reformation when key
documents were drafted and published that sought to be authoritative
declarations of Calvinistic theology. These
documents include The Three Forms of Unity (mentioned previously) and the
Westminster Standards (The Westminster Confession of Faith and the Shorter and
Larger Catechisms). Significant Calvinistic theologians during this period
include John Owen (1616–83), Francis Turretin (1623–87), and Wilhelmus à Brakel
(1635–1711).
Calvinism would go through a period of globalisation from the eighteenth to the twentieth centuries. In North America, Calvinism was largely shaped by the early American colonies, especially New England Puritanism. Jonathan Edwards (1703–58) was a major Calvinistic influence during this period and George Whitefield (1714–70) was a significant populariser of Calvinistic thought among early evangelicals and Calvinistic Methodists in England and Wales. Missionary movements spread Calvinism to Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Neo-Calvinism took shape under the tutelage of Abraham Kuyper (1837–1920) and Herman Bavinck (1854–1921) in the Dutch Reformed Church which emphasised Calvinism not only as a soteriological set of doctrinal beliefs, but as a spiritual worldview and philosophy of life. The neo-Calvinists adopted a more holistic version of the Reformed faith. Abraham Kuyper, for example, emphasised Calvinism’s relevance to all areas of human life and activity from politics to philosophy to education. Karl Barth (1886–1968) offered an alternative reading of Calvin and post-Reformation thought in the form of neo-orthodoxy which adopted and adapted Reformed doctrines from the 1920s to the 1960s to combat the theological liberalism of Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768–1834), a German theologian, philosopher, and biblical scholar widely regarded as the ‘Father of Modern Liberal Theology’. Significant Reformed theologians and pastors who deserve mention for their resistance to modernism in theology include Charles Hodge (1797–1878), William G. T. Shedd (1820–94), B. B. Warfield (1851–1921), J. Gresham Machen (1881–1937), John Murray (1898–1975), Cornelius Van Til (1895–1987), Gordon Clark (1902–85), David Martin Lloyd-Jones (1899–1981), and J. I. Packer (1926–2020) – to name just a few. Reformed theologians generally took the lead in polemics against modernism. J. Gresham Machen, for example, wrote a devasting critique of modernism in his short book Christianity and Liberalism (1923), and Cornelius Van Til would write a similar critique of Barthianism in 1962 which he regarded as a ‘new modernism’.
The spread of Calvinism during the twentieth century in the UK was certainly helped by the influence of David Martyn Lloyd-Jones, also known as the ‘Doctor’. Lloyd-Jones was a medical doctor who became a popularizer of Calvinistic Methodism and the theology of Jonathan Edwards in the UK, famously pastoring Westminster Chapel in London. Along with Iain Murray, Lloyd-Jones would be a crucial influence behind the Banner of Truth publishing company which would disseminate Puritan and Reformed literature around the world. Donald Macleod (1940–2023) and Iain D. Campbell (1963–2017) would be significant to the development of Reformed theology in Scotland, particularly within the Free Church of Scotland. While in the USA, Reformed theology would largely be disseminated through the influence of John Murray and Cornelius Van Til at Westminster Theological Seminary (WTS). Calvinism would also spread among the fundamentalists through the influence of John MacArthur (1939–2025), while Presbyterians would be influenced by R. C. Sproul (1939–2017) and Ligonier Ministries. Dutch Reformed and Puritan theology would be popularized in America through the influence of Joel Beeke and Reformation Heritage Books (RHB). Walter Chantry, Albert N. Martin, Geoffrey Thomas, and Ernie Reisinger (1919–2004) would be significant influencers among Reformed Baptists on both sides of the Atlantic. During this present author’s lifetime, Calvinism has seen a resurgence of influence among the “Young, Restless, and Reformed” movement in America, especially during the early 2000s with popular Calvinistic preachers and theologians exercising enormous influence in Calvinistic networks. These ‘new Calvinists’ include pastors, preachers, and theologians such as John Piper, R. C. Sproul, Timothy Keller (1950–2023), Wayne Grudem, John MacArthur, Kevin DeYoung, Mark Driscoll, Michael Horton, Joel Beeke, and Paul Washer. The new Calvinism has been a major influence among Presbyterians, Independents, Baptists, and Congregationalists worldwide. It has been particularly influential in evangelical circles, especially those associated with the Gospel Coalition. The retrieval of Calvinism by the “Young, Restless, and Reformed” movement documented by Collin Hansen continues to shape debates on predestination, sovereign grace, and the Reformed faith as a worldview and philosophy of life.
Calvinism, by way of conclusion, may
be defined as that branch of historic Reformed Protestantism that emphasizes
the absolute sovereignty of God in the redemption of human beings. In terms of
soteriology, it teaches the radical or total depravity of humanity and the need
of effectual divine grace for salvation. Though it originated from the
teachings of John Calvin, the French Protestant Reformer, Calvinism is much
broader than Calvin alone. It encompasses a plethora of Reformed theologians working
through the centuries to define, defend, and document what Calvinism really is.
It has been systematised in the great Reformed confessions of faith such as the
Belgic Confession and The Westminster Confession of Faith, and has been the
theology of many of Christianity’s major theologians such as John Calvin
himself (1509–1564), John Knox (c.1514–1572), Theodore Beza (1519–1605),
Francis Turretin (1623–1687), William Perkins (1558–1602), John Owen
(1616–1683), Jonathan Edwards (1703–1758), Charles Hodge (1797–1878), B.B.
Warfield (1851–1921), Abraham Kuyper (1837–1920), Herman Bavinck (1854–1921),
Louis Berkhof (1873–1957), Karl Barth (1886–1968), and Herman Hoeksema
(1886–1965) – to name just a few. It is the faith of millions of people today
around the world and has truly become a global movement far more diverse and
vibrant than Calvin himself could ever have imagined.
B. Defending Historic Calvinism
It
has been common practice among Reformed theologians in the twentieth and twenty-first
centuries to articulate and defend the so-called five points of Calvinism using
the acronym TULIP. As already mentioned, the acronym stands for total
depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace, and
the perseverance of the saints. Total depravity refers to humanity’s fallen
nature in Adam, spiritual deadness before God in sin, and inability to do any
saving or salvific good (See Romans 3:10–18; Ephesians 2:1–3). Unconditional
election refers to God’s sovereign choice of elect sinners before the
foundation of the world and is especially taught Romans 9 and Ephesians 1:3–14.
Limited atonement or particular redemption refers to the fact that Christ’s
death on the cross, though sufficient to save the whole world, was efficient
for the elect only (John 10:11; Matthew 1:21). In other words, Christ died for
the elect and for their salvation only. He died to save his chosen people from
their sins. Irresistible grace, also known as effectual calling, shows that
God’s grace in the salvation of sinners cannot be thwarted (John 6:37–44; Acts
16:14). God will certainly and infallibly save his people from sin, death, and
hell. None can frustrate his plans for his elect people. The perseverance of
the saints, sometimes referred to as eternal security, is the doctrine that
believers cannot finally lose their salvation or fall away from grace (John
10:28–29; Romans 8:35–39; Philippians 1:6). They will infallibly persevere in
faith and holiness to everlasting life. The so-called five points of Calvinism
may be traced to the confessional document known as the Canons of Dort
(1618–19), though the canons do not follow the same structure or mnemonical
device. Given that the mnemonic arguably creates a misleading impression of
Calvinism, it should be remembered that Calvinism is much a broader system than
the articles written in response to the Remonstrants in 1618–19. Calvinism is a
whole system of theology that covers every aspect of Christian dogmatics and all
the loci of systematic theology. Some theologians such as Abraham Kuyper and
Herman Bavinck even extend Calvinism towards being an entire worldview and
philosophy of life. This point should be kept in mind as we consider the more polemical
view of Calvinism described in the five points. I have been helped in preparing
this section by a small booklet on the five points of Calvinism by W. J. Seaton
published by the Banner of Truth in 1970. All page numbers are to this edition.
1.
Total
Depravity (also known as Total Inability)
The
first human couple sinned in such a way as to ensure that all human posterity
descending from them would be born with inherited guilt and corruption. When
Adam fell, humanity fell. According to the Apostle Paul, ‘Wherefore, as by one
man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all
men, for that all have sinned’ (Romans 5:12). This is known as the doctrine of
original sin and is generally accepted by both Calvinists and Arminians. Pelagianism,
however, would dispute this point and modern variants would argue that human
beings are born as a blank slate (tabula rasa) after Enlightenment fashion,
neither good nor evil, but with the potential to do both. We may be influenced
to sin, but according to the Enlightenment we do not inherit sin. However, as
Seaton observes, ‘If we have deficient and light views about sin, then we are
liable to have defective views regarding the means necessary for the salvation
of the sinner’ (Seaton, The Five Points of Calvinism, p. 7). Because of
the fall of humanity into sin, all humankind is corrupted by sin in every
aspect of their being and personality – heart, mind, will, and affections. We
are sinners in Adam, the inheritors of his guilt and corruption. In the words
of The New-England Primer (1688) by Benjamin Harris: ‘In Adam’s fall, we
sinned all’.
The Bible teaches that all human
beings are ‘dead in trespasses and sins’ (Ephesians 2:1) and are incapable of
seeking after God without divine grace (Romans 3: 10–18). In fact, Paul’s
argument in Romans chapter three (vv. 10–18) draws upon numerous Old Testament
passages and comprehensively summarises the doctrine of total depravity. According
to the Apostle Paul, nobody is forensically or judicially right with God by
nature. No one understands the things of God. No one seeks after God. No one
does any saving or soteriological good. Although unbelievers are capable of
relative good in terms of civil morality by God’s common grace, yet they can do
nothing to merit salvation before God. As Isaiah says, ‘But we are all as an
unclean thing, and all our righteousness is as filthy rags; and we all do fade
as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away’ (Isaiah
64:6). Even our bodies are used for sin: the throat, tongue, lips, mouth, and
feet. Ultimately, unbelievers are totally devoid of godly fear and repentance
since ‘there is no fear of God before their eyes’ (Psalm 36:1).
Paul argues in his letter to the
Corinthians that ‘the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of
God: for they are foolishness to him; neither can he know them, because they
are spiritually discerned’ (1 Corinthians 2:14). This is not to say, however,
that all people are as bad as they can possibly be. Not everyone is a Hitler or
a Stalin – and even such formidable dictators were not as evil they could have
been, despite the enormity of their crimes. The world could be much worse than
it currently is. Absolute depravity is not the meaning of the doctrine of total
depravity. Since God actively restrains the manifestation of sin in the world
through his common grace and mercy to humankind, we are not as bad as we could
be, even though sin taints every aspect of our being and personality. The Fall
described in Genesis chapter three introduced spiritual death into the world,
and not mere sickness as Arminians teach, necessitating the new birth or
regeneration by the Holy Spirit (John 3:2–8). Job askes the question: ‘Who can
bring a clean thing out of an unclean? … Not one!’ (Job 14:4). Similarly,
Jeremiah asks, ‘Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots?’
(Jeremiah 13:23). Some Arminians accept this view of the Fall and human
depravity, but many also argue for the place of free will and human ability in
salvation and for a kind of prevenient grace that gives all human beings the
potential to do saving good and exercise faith. They teach that humankind,
though affected by the Fall, is nonetheless still able to choose spiritual good
and exercise faith in Christ for salvation. This is why many Arminians stress
the importance of making a ‘decision’ for Christ as with the evangelistic
campaigns held by Billy Graham from the late 1940s to the early 2000s. The Reformers argued that the human will is
always in bondage to sin, until the Holy Spirit breaks the bonds of sin and
sets the sinner free. Apart from God’s saving grace, the sinner would never
make a decision for Christ or exercise faith. Sinners who exercise faith and
repentance do so because God has granted these gifts to them and created these
saving virtues in their hearts (2 Timothy 2:25).
2. Unconditional Election (also known as
Sovereign Election)
Unconditional
election is the doctrine that God’s eternal choice of certain elect individuals
for salvation is not based on foreseen merit or faith. On the contrary,
election is solely based on his sovereign grace and mercy – at the back of
which stands his eternal love: ‘For whom he did foreknow, he also did
predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son …’ (Romans 8:29). By way
of contrast, Arminians teach a conditional election based on foreseen faith as
they misinterpret Paul’s use of the word foreknowledge. To foreknow, in the
mind of Jewish listeners, means to forelove. To know someone in Hebrew
thought means to love them to such an extent that it even encompasses erotic
love between a husband and wife (e.g. ‘And Adam knew Eve his wife; and
she conceived’ (Genesis 4:1)). It emphatically does not mean that God knew who
would believe ahead of time and chose them on the basis of their decision to
accept Christ. This is plainly contrary to Pauline theology. The reason God
foreknows who will believe is because he has eternally decreed these persons
unto salvation. Paul argues in Ephesians that believers were ‘chosen before the
foundation of the world’ and were predestined to salvation ‘according to the
purpose of his will’ (Ephesians 1:4–5). Similarly, in Romans 9: 11–16, Paul
argues that God’s election is not based on human merit, effort, or
decision-making, but wholly and entirely upon his mercy. God says, ‘I will have
mercy on whom I will have mercy’ (Romans 9:15). This doctrine magnifies God’s
grace. Salvation is entirely a work of divine mercy and love. It is not earned,
merited, or foreseen, but is freely given according to the riches of His grace.
The doctrine of unconditional election follows logically from the doctrine of
total depravity. If human beings are completely unable to save themselves, then
if anyone is to be saved God must intervene in the human situation and redeem
lost humanity. ‘The story of the Bible is the story of unconditional election’
(Seaton, The Five Points of Calvinism, p. 10). The whole message of
Scripture is that God freely chooses to save a people for himself. He chose the
patriarchs and their offspring to be his peculiar people. Abraham, Isaac,
Jacob, and Joseph were all freely chosen by God for salvation. It had nothing
to do with their merits or faith, but everything to do with God who has mercy:
‘The Lord did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because you were more
in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people: but because
the Lord loved you …’ (Deuteronomy 7:7). According to his eternal decree, and
so that the purpose of election might stand, God chose Jacob over Esau: ‘Jacob
have I loved’, God says, ‘but Esau have I hated’ (Romans 19:11–13). Those whom
God loves, he chooses; those whom He hates, He reprobates. In the New
Testament, Jesus tells his disciples, ‘Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen
you’ (John 15:16). Paul argues in Ephesians that we were ‘chosen in Christ from
the foundation of the world … [and] predestinated unto the adoption of
children’ (Ephesians 1: 4, 5). Luke argues that the purpose of election was
present in the redemption of sinners in the book of Acts, ‘And as many as were
ordained to eternal life believed’ (Acts 13:48). This does not exclude
assurance of salvation as some Arminians accuse Calvinists of teaching. On the
contrary, we teach with the Apostle Peter the importance of diligently seeking
the assurance of faith by making our calling and election sure: ‘Wherefore the
rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if
ye do these things, ye shall never fall’ (2 Peter 1:10).
3.
Limited
Atonement (also known
as Particular Redemption)
The
doctrine of limited atonement is perhaps the most controversial point in the
acronym TULIP. Many sincere Christian believers instinctively feel that
Christ’s atonement extends to the whole world as is seemingly taught so clearly in John
3:16, for example. There is some truth in this point as there is an element of
universality in the atonement. Some Calvinists known as Amyraldians (followers
of Moses Amyraut, 1596–1664) are advocates of a modified form of Calvinism
which actually denies the doctrine of limited atonement and embraces a kind of
hypothetical universalism. We might call them ‘four-point Calvinists’ for
shorthand. Similarly, Arminians have taught a universal redemption and a
general atonement. For the Arminian, Christ died to make salvation possible for
all humanity, but only on the condition of faith. However, orthodox Calvinism
has traditionally argued that the atonement though sufficient for all, is
efficient only for the elect. Limited atonement is about Christ’s intention in
dying on the cross. Why did He die? What did his death achieve? His death could
have saved everyone who has ever lived and ever shall live (as universalists
teach), or it could have made salvation possible for all (as in hypothetical
universalism). The point Calvinists make, however, is that the atonement is
particular to the elect alone and actually accomplishes their salvation (as in
definite atonement or particularism). Christ died intending to save his people,
not the whole world. His death was effectual for their salvation only. He died
to actually save, not merely to make salvation possible. It is not the
possibility of salvation that is freely offered in the gospel, but the
certainty of it. ‘If it was God’s intention to save the entire world [as
Arminians teach], then the atonement of Christ has been a great failure, for
vast numbers of mankind have not been saved’ (Seaton, The Five Points of
Calvinism, p. 15). However, according to the Gospel of John, Jesus lays
down his life ‘for his sheep’ (John 10: 11, 15), and not for everyone. He does
not die indiscriminately for all. His name is called Jesus because he will save
his chosen people from their sins (Matthew 1:21; Titus 2:14). He died for ‘the
many’, but not for everybody: ‘This is the blood of the new covenant, which is
shed for many, for the remission of sins’ (Mattew 26:28). Jesus ‘loved the
church, and gave himself for it’ (Ephesians 5:25). ‘He was delivered for our
offences, and raised again for our justification’ (Romans 4:25) – notice
the particularism of Pauline language on this subject. Similarly, Isaiah says,
‘By his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall
bear their iniquities’ (Isaiah 53:11). The whole language of atonement
is spoken of in terms of particularism.
4. Irresistible grace (also known as Effectual
Calling)
When
God graciously calls someone to salvation, the sweetness of his grace overcomes
the resistance caused by sin and brings the elect person effectually to faith
in Christ. Jesus says, ‘All that the Father gives me will come to me … [and] no
one can come [to me] unless the Father draws him’ (John 6:37, 44). According to
the doctrine of irresistible grace, the Holy Spirit’s work of regeneration
precedes faith. It is actually responsible for making faith possible. This is
taught in various places such as John 3:3–8 and Ezekiel 36:26–27. Those whom
God predestines to salvation; he also effectually calls by his mercy and grace
(Romans 8:30). There are two kinds of calling involved in the drawing of the
sinner to Christ. There is the outward call of the free offer in the preaching
of the word of God, and there is the inward and effectual call of the Father by
the Holy Spirit. The outward call is indiscriminate and is offered freely to
all sinners, but the inward and effectual call is limited to the elect alone and
guarantees their salvation. The doctrine of the effectual call is taught in
various places of Holy Scripture. For example, Jesus says, ‘All that the Father
giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast
out’ (John 6:37). Notice that those who are effectually called are
those whom the the Father has ‘given to Christ’ – those whom God has chosen or
selected and entrusted into his care – they are said to infallibly come to
Christ for salvation, without fail. They will never be rejected or cast out by
Christ because the Father has given them to him for safe keeping. Similarly,
Jesus says, ‘No man can come to me except the Father which hath sent me draw
him’ (John 6:44). Notice that effectual calling is specially described as God
the Father’s work in this verse. He effectually and mercifully woos the sinner
and draws him with the chords of love, grace, and mercy to himself. The idea is
not so much that God forces sinners to be converts, but rather effectually and
graciously persuades them to come freely by grace. He opens their hearts to
believe. Jesus also says, ‘Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath
learned of the Father, cometh unto me’ (John 6:45). Many may hear the outward
call of the Gospel, but only those ‘taught of the Father’ will experience
salvation. So, as Jesus says to Simon Peter, ‘Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona,
for flesh and blood hath not revealed it into thee, but my Father which is in
heaven’ (Matthew 16:17). Paul says that ‘as many as are led by the Spirit of
God, they are the sons of God’ (Romans 8:14). Those whom the Spirit leads are
those whom the Father saves and adopts as his children. Peter says that God has
called the elect ‘out of darkness and into his marvellous light’ (1 Peter 2:9)
and that he has ‘called us unto his eternal glory by Christ Jesus’ (1 Peter
5:10). God’s effectual call is seen in the salvation of Lydia, a seller of
purple cloth: ‘A certain woman named Lydia heard us; whose heart the Lord
opened, that she attended unto the things that were spoken of Paul’ (Acts
16:14). According to Seaton, ‘Paul, the preacher, spoke to Lydia’s ear – the
outward call; but the Lord spoke to Lydia’s heart – the inward call of
irresistible grace’ (Seaton, The Five Points of Calvinism, p. 18). God
the Father’s effectual call by the Holy Spirit is distinct from the general call
of the gospel given by preachers and evangelists. Preachers and evangelists may
often be unsuccessful, but God’s effectual call always results in conversion.
It comes down to a contest of wills – and God always wins. His plans for his
elect people cannot be frustrated by the human will, no matter how stubborn or
hardened the heart may initially be under sin. God’s call is an effectual call.
That means he always succeeds in calling those whom He has chosen. His grace is
irresistible.
5.
Perseverance
of the Saints (or Eternal Security)
The
doctrine of the perseverance (or sometimes preservation) of the saints means
that those truly regenerated, called, and justified will persevere in faith and
holiness until the end and experience full salvation. This is sometimes known
as the doctrine of ‘eternal security’ in evangelical circles. Historic or
classical Arminians teach that a believer may fall from grace and lose his
salvation. If he must take the initiative in salvation through his decision to
accept Christ, then he must retain his responsibility for keeping himself in a
state of grace. Not all Arminians accept this point of view, however. Some
evangelical Arminians believe that the Christian is ‘eternally secure’, though
these are in a minority. They seem to have been influenced by Calvinistic
teaching on this matter, and this is sometimes known as the OSAS doctrine or
‘once saved, always saved’ position and is particularly believed among Southern
Baptists of an Arminian persuasion in the United States. Paul teaches in Romans 8:30 that ‘Those
whom God predestined; He also glorified’—none are lost along the way. Their
glorification is so certain that it was written by the apostle in the past
tense as if it were already true of the elect. Paul also says in Philippians
1:6 that ‘He that hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day
of Jesus Christ’. True believers may stumble, they may even backslide for a
time, but they are kept by God’s power and cannot finally be lost (1 Peter 1:5;
John 10:28–29). Paul says that he is certain that ‘neither death, nor life …
nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which
is in Christ Jesus our Lord’ (Romans 8:29). There are many verses of Scripture
which teach the doctrine of the perseverance of the saints: ‘And this is the
Father’s will, that of all he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should
raise it up at the last day’ (John 6:39). Believers are kept by the will of God
safely in the hands of Christ. ‘I give unto my sheep eternal life, and they
shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand’ (John
10:28). None shall pluck them from the hand of Christ. It is the hand of
omnipotence. And underneath are the everlasting arms of God the Father
(Deuteronomy 33:27). ‘For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God
by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his
life’ (Romans 5:10). This is known in informal logic as an a fortiori
argument and used to express a conclusion for which there is stronger evidence
than for previously accepted point. If we are reconciled by the death of
Christ, how much more are we saved by his life! ‘There is therefore now no
condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus’ (Romans 8:1). Once in Him, in
Him forever. ‘The salvation that begins in the mind and purpose of God must end
in the fulfilment of his unthwartable purpose that those ‘whom he died
foreknow’ are eternally united with their saviour’ (Seaton, The Five Points
of Calvinism, p. 21).
The design and purpose of the five points of Calvinism is to teach that ‘salvation belongs to the Lord’ (Psalm 3:8) and that all glory and honour for the work of redemption belongs to God alone – encapsulated by the slogan soli deo gloria: ‘Not unto us, O LORD, not unto us, but unto thy name give glory, for thy mercy, and for thy truth's sake’ (Psalm 115:1). Far from being a hindrance to evangelism, the doctrines of grace are a reason to go out into the world and preach the Gospel because we have full assurance that God will infallibly save his elect people from their sins. As the Lord God says, ‘So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please’ (Isaiah 55:11). Some of the greatest preachers and evangelists from church history have been Calvinists: William Carey (1761–1834), Andrew Fuller (1754–1815), David Brainerd (1718–47), George Whitefield (1714–70), Robert Murray M’Cheyne (1813–43), Andrew Bonar (1810–92), William Burns (1815–68), Charles Haddon Spurgeon (1834–92), Archibald G. Brown (1844 –1922), and David Martyn Lloyd-Jones (1899–1981). Calvinism is the beating heart of the doctrine of salvation. It is soteriologically the sum and centre of the Gospel message itself. The five points of Calvinism are the five points of true Gospel preaching. They are at the very heart of the message of the good news of Jesus Christ. As Charles H. Spurgeon famously said, ‘I have my own private opinion that there is no such thing as preaching Christ and him crucified, unless we preach what is nowadays called Calvinism. It is a nickname to call it Calvinism; Calvinism is the Gospel, and nothing else’ (Charles H. Spurgeon, A Defense of Calvinism, p. 12). As the psalmist reminds us, salvation belongs to the Lord Jesus Christ (Psalm 3:8). It is he who has saved us, and not we ourselves.
C. Documenting Historic Calvinism
Several
key theologians in the history of Calvinism are worthy of particular mention as
their published writings or documents form the backbone of the Reformed canon
of religious and theological literature in Western society. Many of these
writings stand out as some of the most important and seminal theological works
ever written and the theologians themselves are regarded as some of the most
important in Western history. No student of theology should be ignorant of
them. This final chapter will consider several well-known theologians and their
seminal works including John Calvin, Henrich Bullinger, John Owen, Francis
Turretin, Jonathan Edwards, Abraham Kuyper, Herman Bavinck, and Karl Barth.
Mention will also be made of the major Reformed confessions of faith including
the Three Forms of Unity and the Westminster Standards.
a. John Calvin (1509–64) and Henrich Bullinger
(1504–75)
Mention
has already been made of John Calvin and The Institutes of the Christian
Religion (1559) as a seminal text. Calvin may certainly be described in
terms of being a primus inter pares or ‘first among equals’. As already
mentioned, the first edition of the Institutes was published in Latin in
1536 and was subsequently revised continuously by Calvin until the definitive
edition was published in Latin in 1559. This is generally the text used by
modern translations of the Institutes. The final edition in French was
published in 1560 and was enthusiastically received by those who could not read
Latin. The Institutes is divided into four major books which cover the
knowledge of God as creator, the knowledge of God as redeemer in Christ, the
mode of obtaining the grace of Christ, and the external means by which God
invites us into the society of Christ or the holy catholic church. Calvin’s
purpose in writing the Institutes was to provide the Reformation world
with a systematic or dogmatic theology defending Protestant doctrine against Roman
Catholicism and Anabaptism. It was also written to instruct believers,
especially those under persecution, and to encourage them to stand fast in
holding the principles of the Protestant religion. The Institutes was
designed to be read in tandem with Calvin’s commentaries and sermons on the
Bible. It was not meant to stand alone but was designed to be read holistically
with Calvin’s other exegetical writings, particularly his commentaries and
published sermons. Nonetheless, the Institutes was foundational for
Reformed theology and is widely regarded as one of the most important texts in
the history of Calvinism. It would go on to shape confessional standards,
doctrinal literature, and would be formative in developing a Reformed
ecclesiology that emphasized the role of elders or presbyters in the church. Another
key theologian during the Reformation, who was arguably more important than
Calvin in his day, was Heinrich Bullinger. His collected sermons known as The
Decades of Heinrich Bullinger remain a seminal text for understanding
Protestant theology. It contains fifty sermons in five sets of ten or ‘decades’
and considers major theological loci such as the word of God, faith and the
creed, the decalogue, sacraments, prayer, and the Christian life. It was
designed for both laypeople and clergy and was deeply pastoral and
catechetical, perhaps explaining its popularity among the laity. Bullinger,
like Calvin, was a second-generation Reformer and his Decades were
widely used in England and on the continent as a theological training manual
alongside of Calvin’s Institutes.
b. The Three Forms of Unity and
Westminster Standards
The
major confessional documents most strongly associated with the Reformed faith are
the Three Forms of Unity and the Westminster Standards. These are the
confessional documents of the Dutch Reformed Church and global Presbyterianism
respectively. They are still used as the main confessional documents by the Dutch
Reformed churches and Presbyterian churches to this day. The Three Forms of
Unity consists of the Heidelberg Catechism (1563), the Belgic Confession
(1561), and the Canons of Dort (1618–19). The Heidelberg Catechism is warm,
rich, and deeply pastoral in tone. It is structured around the themes of guilt,
grace, and gratitude. The Belgic Confession is a more scholastic doctrinal
summary of Reformed orthodoxy and was written against the errors of Romans
Catholicism on the one hand and the Anabaptism of the radical Reformation on
the other. As already mentioned, the Canons of Dort respond to the five points made
against Calvinism by the followers of Jacob Arminius known as the Remonstrants.
These five points would come to define Calvinistic orthodoxy and would form the
backbone of the acronym TULIP widely used in the twentieth and twenty-first
centuries as a polemical summary of Calvinism. The purpose of these documents was
originally to create doctrinal unity among the Dutch Reformed churches and to
provide doctrinal clarity during theological conflicts and disagreements. The
Westminster Standards were produced by the Westminster Assembly during the
Cromwellian Revolution between 1643 and 1653 and consist of the Westminster
Confession of Faith (1646), the Shorter Catechism (1646–47), and the Larger
Catechism (1643). The Westminster Confession of Faith covers all the major loci
of systematic or dogmatic theology emphasising the doctrines of holy scripture,
the covenant of works, the covenant of grace, and ecclesiastical or church
polity. The Shorter Catechism was written for children and the uneducated laity
and opens with the famous question: ‘What is the chief end of man?’ ‘The chief
end of man is to glorify God and enjoy him forever’. A catechism is a form of
question and answer designed to teach theological and ethical truths. The
Shorter Catechism was written for beginners in the faith and children, while
the larger and more substantial catechism was written for adults and Christian
ministers. While the Shorter Catechism has enjoyed considerable popularity and
widespread use, the Larger Catechism has tended to be neglected by readers,
perhaps owing to its longer and more difficult sentences which can be tricky to
memorise. Thomas Ridgeley’s Body of Divinity, a two-volume work printed
in 1731–33, appears to be one of the few major works written on the Larger
Catechism. The Westminster Standards were adopted by Presbyterian churches
worldwide (especially in North America and Scotland) and the documents have
been foundational for Reformed theology in the anglophone world.
c. John Owen (1616–83) and English
Puritanism
The
most significant post-reformation movement to emerge in England and Wales was
Puritanism. Many of the more theologically minded Puritans such as John Owen
(1616–83) used similar theological methodologies to the continental scholastic
and reformed theologians, making fine distinctions based upon the careful
exegesis of Scriptural passages. While the Puritans were concerned with
theological method, their principal concerns were pragmatic and pastoral. They
desired to continue in the spirit of ecclesia
semper reformanda by furthering the spiritual and liturgical reformation of
the Church of England. These reforms would ultimately be rejected by the
Established Church in 1662 and Puritan ministers who failed to conform were
ejected from the ministry. John Owen is widely regarded as the most significant
Reformed theologian of the Puritan era. The Banner of Truth publish a 16-volume
edition of his collected works and his seven-volume commentary on the book of
Hebrews. Crossway is planning to release a 40-volume critical edition of his
collected writings which will translate passages in Latin, Hebrew, and Greek.
Owen never wrote a systematic theology, but his published writings explore all
the major loci of Reformed dogmatics including the Trinity and Christology, the
Holy Spirit, justification and sanctification, ecclesiology and worship – and
not to mention a careful exegesis of the book of Hebrews. Readers of Owen will
know by experience that his writing can dense and difficult to follow. It
nonetheless remains deeply devotional and abounds with a sense of God’s
presence. He is not known as the ‘Prince of Puritans’ without reason.
d. Francis Turretin (1623–87) and
Reformed Scholasticism
One
of the most important movements to emerge in the aftermath of the Protestant Reformation
was a new form of scholasticism. The scholastic movement within post-Reformation
Protestantism represents a synthesis of the tenants of reformed theology with
the methods of medieval scholasticism and the philosopher Aristotle. The most
significant representative of this ethos within Reformed Protestantism was
Francis Turretin (1623–87), the author of the Institutes of Elenctic Theology (1979–85). While the word ‘institutes’
echoes the title of Calvin’s magnum opus, the word ‘elenctic’ refers to the
method of exposing and refuting theological error. Scholasticism was developed
‘in part for the sake of debating Roman Catholic polemicists … [and also] for
the sake of developing the implications of the Reformers’ teaching for a full
system of Christian doctrine’ (Richard A. Muller, ‘Scholasticism Protestant and
Catholic …’, p. 194). Scholasticism was particularly concerned with questions
of method and ‘the development of theological prolegomena or loci dealing with
the topics fundamental to theology’ (Richard A. Muller, ‘Scholasticism
Protestant and Catholic …’, p. 194). In this respect, post-reformation
scholasticism, with its concern for system building, was instrumental in the
development of the modern academic discipline of systematic theology. Though
the movement was theologically reformed, it nonetheless drew upon the modus operandi of medieval scholastic
theologians by presenting a theological issue in the form of a thesis or
question, noting various objections, and answering objections through careful
exegesis of Scripture, rational argumentation, and discussion concerning the
historical position of the church on the matter in question. Turretin’s Institutes
of Elenctic Theology was published between 1679–85 in Latin. It is
structured around twenty topics or doctrinal loci, each with questions and
objections following an elenctic method. Key theological themes include
Scripture, God, Christ, justification, predestination, and the sacraments of
baptism and Holy Eucharist. Turretin’s work represents the high point of
Reformed scholasticism, and his writings would deeply influence the Princeton
theologians such as Charles Hodge and B. B. Warfield.
e. Jonathan Edwards (1703–58) and the
Emergence of Evangelicalism
Jonathan Edwards is widely considered to be one of America’s most important Christian thinkers – a theologian of comparable significance to St. Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, John Calvin, or Karl Barth. His published writings, made available online by Yale University, extend to some 73 volumes on subjects as various as aesthetics, metaphysics, typology, redemptive history, ethics, and revival. His complex ideas have won the attention of historians, theologians, literary critics, psychologists, and philosophers working across universities all over the world. It is a remarkable legacy for a humble pastor and a Gospel preacher who sought to guide lost sinners to Christ and to help Christians to make sense of the work of the Spirit of God. Some of his most important writings include The Freedom of the Will, The Religious Affections, Original Sin, The Life of David Brainerd, and thousands of letters, sermons, tracts, and miscellaneous writings. The major themes of Edwards’ writings include revival, religious affections, typology, metaphysics, redemptive history, and eschatology. He is widely regarded as American’s greatest theologian and his life and work served as a bridge between New England Puritanism and the emergence of evangelicalism during the eighteenth century. He is arguably the father of modern evangelical theology. Edwards considered himself to be a moderate Calvinist and generally sympathetic with Calvin's theology. He even says that he ‘should not take it at all amiss, to be called a Calvinist, for distinction's sake: though I utterly disclaim a dependence on Calvin’ (Edwards, Freedom of the Will, p. 131).
f. Abraham Kuyper (1837–1920) and Herman
Bavinck (1854–1921)
Abraham
Kuyper was a Dutch politician, a journalist, philosopher, statesman and
theologian. One of his most valuable ideas concerns the lordship of Christ and
its relationship to human existence. He is famous for the neo-Calvinist saying,
‘There is not a square inch in the whole domain of our human existence over
which Christ, who is Sovereign over all, does not cry: “Mine!”’ (James D. Bratt
(ed.), Abraham Kuyper: A Centennial Reader, p. 488). For Kuyper, life could not be divided into
‘sacred’ and ‘secular’ activities. There is one sovereign Lord of all human
life, and therefore there is one, unified human life lived under and in the
light of Christ’s lordship – coram deo. There are many spheres of human
activity within the world and Kuyper’s point is that Christ’s lordship
encompasses them all. An illustration might help to elucidate this point: suppose
someone had a great blackboard behind them and upon it numerous circles
highlighting all the areas of human thought, activity, and existence. The would
be a circle labelled art, another science, another philosophy, music, politics,
religion, geography, history, mathematics, computing, literature, sport,
medicine, agriculture, business, the family, retirement, and so on. Kuyper’s
point is this: around all these smaller circles there is one great circle entitled
‘the sovereignty of God in Christ Jesus’. For Kuyper, Jesus Christ is Lord of everything,
and all life is to be lived in light of his lordship. He is Lord in the office,
Lord in the workplace, Lord in the college. He is Lord at the university, Lord in
the lecture theatre, He is Lord on the street, in the school, at the cafe, even in the
cinema. He is Lord in the home, amidst the family. He is even Lord of our
thoughts and emotions. This is why, according to the Apostle Paul, we are to bring ‘every
thought captive in obedience to
Christ Jesus’ (2 Corinthians 10:5). Kuyper’s most important theological works
include his Lectures on Calvinism (1898) which were originally delivered
at Princeton theological seminary and which explore Calvinism as a worldview
affecting every aspect of human life including religion, politics, science,
art, and eschatology. He is also well-known for his writings on common grace
which explore God’s benevolence to all humanity, and not simply the elect.
Kuyper is widely regarded as the founder of neo-Calvinism and is noted for his
emphasis on cultural engagement and developing a Christian worldview.
Herman Bavinck was Dutch Reformed
theologian who along with Abraham Kuyper was instrumental in the emergence and
development of neo-Calvinism in the late nineteenth century. His theology is
deeply Trinitarian and conscious of culture and has often been summarised with
the phrase ‘grace restores nature’. In Bavinck’s own words: ‘The essence of the
Christian religion consists in the reality that the creation of the Father,
[though] ruined by sin, is restored in the death of the Son of God, and
recreated by the grace of the Holy Spirit into a kingdom of God’ (Reformed
Dogmatics, vol. 1, p. 112). Bavinck is most widely known for his four
volume Reformed Dogmatics published between 1895 and 1901. These volumes
were translated by Baker Academic into English for the anglophone world between
2003 and 2008. The major topics considered are prolegomena, God and creation,
sin and salvation, the Holy Spirit, the church, and eschatology. His theology
is deeply organic, rich in historical consciousness, and represents a balance
of scholastic precision with pastoral warmth and energy.
g. Karl Barth (1886–1968) and
Neo-Orthodoxy
Karl
Barth is the final Reformed or Calvinistic theologian we must mention, though
some would prefer to describe him as a neo-orthodox theologian. Whatever his
designation, Barth is certainly one of the most significant Reformed theologians
of the twentieth century and the most influential in modern theology. Barth is
known for his critique and rejection of theological liberalism as voiced in his
commentary on St Paul’s epistle to the Romans which, according to one
commentator, ‘dropped like a bombshell on the playground of theologians’ (Karl
Adam). His critique of ‘religion’ or ‘religiosity’ represents a key theme of
his commentary on the epistle to the Romans. According to Barth, ‘It was the
Church, not the world, which crucified Christ’. He is also known for his role
in the Confessing Church, his opposition to Nazism, his theological involvement
in formulating the Barmen Declaration, and for his multivolume but unfinished Church
Dogmatics. His fame was sufficiently noted in his lifetime when he appeared
on the cover of Time Magazine for the 20th April 1962. Barth
has exercised a decisive influence on modern theology during the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries. Notable thinkers indebted to his theology include
Dietrich Bonhoffer, Jürgen Moltmann, Wolfhart Pannenberg, Thomas F. Torrance,
and Reinhold Niebuhr among many others. He has been described as the father of
‘neo-orthodoxy’, though he would repudiate the title, which itself suggests a
return to orthodox theology of Calvin and the Reformers as opposed to the
modernism of theological liberalism.
Barth was born into a Swiss theologically
minded family and himself influenced by the liberal theology of his day and
age, particularly as it found expression in the thought of Adolf von Harnack,
Wilhelm Herrmann, and Friedrich Schleiermacher. He worked briefly writing as a
journalist for Die Christliche Welt (The Christian World)
and served as an assistant pastor in Geneva before becoming pastor at Safenwil
in the Aargau from 1911 to 1921. Confronted by the challenges of his
congregation and pastoral ministry, Barth became increasingly disillusioned
with the liberal theology of his time and increasing turned to Scripture itself
for answers. This eventually led to his publication of a commentary on the
epistle to the Romans which jaw-shatteringly broke with the liberalism of his
university professors. Its return to the Protestant principle of Scripture
alone (sola scriptura) as the normative source of Christian theology was
decisive. For some time, Barth taught theology in Göttingen and Münster and was
a key figure in the emerging ‘dialectical theology’ movement, sometimes known
as a theology of ‘crisis’. This theology was deeply influenced by an emerging
cultural and religious backlash against liberal theology. After moving to Bonn,
Barth became increasing involved in politics, especially in opposition to Adolf
Hitler, and was the primary hand behind the Barmen Declaration penned in 1934.
This document stood in opposition to Nazism and confessed allegiance to none
but Christ and Scripture. He was subsequently dismissed from his post and took
up an appointment at his native Basel where he remained for the rest of his
life and where he continued working on his Church Dogmatics published
over several years between 1932–67. The unfinished Church Dogmatics
amounts to thirteen part-volumes structured around the doctrine of the word of
God, the doctrine of God, the doctrine of creation, the doctrine of
reconciliation (unfinished), and the proposed doctrine of redemption
(unwritten). Barth’s theology is deeply Christocentric, dialectical, and
anti-natural. He remains the most significant Calvinist theology of the
twentieth century and is work is foundational for modern dogmatics.
Conclusion
Calvinism
is far more than the five points summarized by the acronym TULIP. It is a
comprehensive theological system rooted in the sovereignty of God and the
historic Reformed tradition. Emerging from the thought of John Calvin and his
contemporaries, Calvinism revived Augustinian principles, emphasizing salvation
by grace alone (sola gratia) and the futility of human merit. While the
five points—total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement,
irresistible grace, and perseverance of the saints—serve as a helpful
framework, they represent only a fraction of a broader worldview that shapes
doctrine, worship, and life. Across the centuries, Calvinism has influenced
confessional standards, global missions, and cultural engagement, producing
seminal works by theologians such as Calvin, Bullinger, Owen, Turretin,
Edwards, Kuyper, Bavinck, and Karl Barth. Today, it remains a vibrant, global
movement, affirming that ‘salvation belongs to the Lord’ (Psalm 3:8) and that
all glory and honour for redemption is due to God alone – soli deo gloria.
Bibliography
Allen,
Michael, and Scott R. Swain (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Reformed Theology
(Oxford, 2020).
Backus,
Irena, and Phillip Benedict, Calvin and His Influence 1509–2009 (Oxford,
2011).
Balserak,
Jon, Calvinism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford, 2016).
Balserak,
Jon, John Calvin as Sixteenth-Century Prophet (Oxford, 2014).
Barth,
Karl, The Theology of John Calvin (Grand Rapids, MI, 1995).
Beeke,
Joel, Living For God’s Glory: An Introduction to Calvinism (Sanford, FL,
2008).
Benedict,
Phillip, Christ’s Churches Purely Reformed: A Social History of Calvinism
(New Haven & London, 2002).
Benton,
John, Evangelistic Calvinism: Why the Doctrines of Grace are Good News
(Edinburgh, 2006).
Beza,
Theodore, The Life of John Calvin (Darlington, 1997).
Boettner,
Loraine, The Reformed Doctrine of Predestination (Phillipsburg, NJ,
1932).
Bouwsma,
William, John Calvin: A Sixteenth-Century Portrait (Oxford, 1988).
Bratt,
James D., (ed.), Abraham Kuyper: A Centennial Reader (Cambridge, 1998).
Cammenga,
Ronald, and Ronald Hanko, Saved By Grace: A Study of the Five Points of
Calvinism (Grandville, MI, 2002).
Crisp,
Oliver D., Deviant Calvinism: Broadening Reformed Theology (Minneapolis,
MN, 2014).
Crisp,
Oliver D., Saving Calvinism: Expanding the Reformed Tradition (Downers
Grove, IL, 2016).
Daniel,
Curt, The History and Theology of Calvinism (Darlington, 2019).
Eglinton,
James, Bavinck: A Critical Biography (Grand Rapids, MI, 2020).
Engelsma,
David J., The Reformed Faith of John Calvin: The Institutes in Summary
(Jenison, MI, 2009).
Gibson,
David and Jonathan Gibson (eds), From Heaven He Came and Sought Her:
Definite Atonement in Historical, Biblical, Theological, and Pastoral
Perspective (Wheaton, IL, 2013).
Gordon,
Bruce and Carl R. Trueman (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Calvin and Calvinism
(Oxford, 2021).
Gordon,
Bruce and Emidio Campi, Architect of Reformation: An Introduction to
Heinrich Bullinger (Eugene, OR, 2004).
Gordon,
Bruce, Calvin (New Haven & London, 2009).
Gribben,
Crawford and Graeme Murdock (eds), Cultures of Calvinism in Early Modern
Europe (New York and Oxford, 2019).
Gribben,
Crawford, John Owen and English Puritanism (Oxford, 2016).
Hamilton,
Ian, What is Experiential Calvinism? (Grand Rapids, MI, 2015).
Hanko,
Herman, and Engelsma, David J., The Five Points of Calvinism (British
Reformed Fellowship, 2008).
Hansen,
Collin, Young, Restless, Reformed: A Journalist’s Journey with the New
Calvinists (Wheaton, IL, 2008).
Hart,
D. G., Calvinism: A History (New Haven & London, 2013).
Helm,
Paul, Calvin and the Calvinists (Edinburgh, 1982).
Holder,
R. Ward (ed.), John Calvin in Context (Cambridge, 2020).
Horton,
Michael, For Calvinism (Grand Rapids, MI, 2011).
Jones,
Paul Dafydd and Paul T. Nimmo (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Karl Barth
(Oxford, 2019).
Kendall,
R. T., Calvin and English Calvinism to 1649 (Oxford, 1981).
Kuyper,
Abraham, Particular Grace: A Defence of God’s Sovereignty in Salvation
(Grandville, MI, 2001).
Letham,
Robert, The Westminster Assembly: Reading its Theology in Historical Context
(Phillipsburg, NJ, 2009).
Marsden,
George M., Jonathan Edwards: A Life (Yale, 2003).
Martin,
A. N., The Practical Implications of Calvinism (Edinburgh, 1979).
McGrath,
Alister, A Life of John Calvin: A Study in the Shaping of Western Culture
(Oxford, 1990).
McKim,
Donald K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to John Calvin (Cambridge,
2004).
McNeill,
The History and Character of Calvinism (Oxford, 1954).
Morgan,
Densil D., The SPCK Introduction to Karl Barth (London, 2010).
Muller,
Richard A., ‘Scholasticism Protestant and Catholic: Francis Turretin on the
Object and Principles of Theology’, American Society of Church History,
55, 2 (Cambridge, 1986), 193 – 205.
Muller,
Richard A., After Calvin: Studies in the Development of a Theological
Tradition (Oxford, 2003).
Muller,
Richard A., Calvin and the Reformed Tradition: On the Work of Christ and the
Order of Salvation (Grand Rapids, MI, 2012).
Muller,
Richard A., The Unaccommodated Calvin: Studies in the Foundation of a
Theological Tradition (Oxford, 2000).
Olson,
Roger E., Arminian Theology: Myths and Realities (Downers Grove, IL,
2006).
Palmer,
Edwin H., The Five Points of Calvinism (Grand Rapids, MI, 1972).
Parker,
T. H. L., John Calvin: A Biography (Oxford, 1975).
Piper,
John, Five Points: Towards a Deeper Experience of God’s Grace (Fearn,
2013).
Seaton,
W. J., The Five Points of Calvinism (Edinburgh, 1970).
Selderhuis,
Herman (ed.), The Calvin Handbook (Grand Rapids, 2009).
Sell,
Alan P. F., The Great Debate: Calvinism, Arminianism, and Salvation
(Worthing, 1982).
Spurgeon,
Charles, A Defence of Calvinism (Edinburgh, 2008).
Stanglin,
Keith D., and Thomas H. McCall, Jacob Arminius: Theologian of Grace
(Oxford, 2012).
Steele,
David N., Curtis C. Thomas, and S. Lance Quinn, The Five Points of
Calvinism: Defined, Defended, and Documented (Phillipsburg NJ, 2004).
Sweeney,
Douglas A., and Jan Stievermann (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Jonathan
Edwards (Oxford, 2021).
Thomas,
Derek W. H., and John W. Tweeddale (eds), John Calvin: For a New Reformation
(Wheaton, IL., 2019).
Thompson,
Mark D. (ed.), Engaging with Calvin: Aspects of the Reformer’s Legacy for
Today (Nottingham, 2009).
Tietz,
Christiane, Karl Barth: A Life in Conflict (Oxford, 2021).
Toon,
Peter, Hyper-Calvinism in English Nonconformity 1689–1768 (London,
1967).
Van
Asselt, William J., Introduction to Reformed Scholasticism (Grand
Rapids, MI, 2011).
Wendel,
Francois, Calvin: The Origins and Development of His Religious Thought
(London, 1963).
Witt,
John R. de, What is the Reformed Faith? (Edinburgh, 1981).