Showing posts with label Sacraments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sacraments. Show all posts

‘Begotten, Not Made’: The Theology of the Nicene Creed

The Nicene Creed

We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of Heaven and Earth, and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten not made, consubstantial with the Father; by whom all things were made. Who for us men, and for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Ghost and of the Virgin Mary, and was made man. He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate, and suffered, and was buried, and the third day He rose again according to the Scriptures, and ascended into heaven, and sits on the right hand of God the Father Almighty. From thence He shall come again, with glory, to judge the living and the dead, and whose Kingdom shall have no end. And in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son, who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified, who spoke by the prophets. And in one holy catholic and apostolic Church; we acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins; we look for the resurrection of the dead, and the glorious life of the world to come. Amen.

Introduction

The Nicene Creed—more fully known as the Nicene–Constantinopolitan Creed—stands as one of the central and defining statements of Christian orthodoxy. First formulated at the Council of Nicaea in AD 325 and later expanded at the Council of Constantinople in AD 381, it forms, together with the Apostles’ Creed and the Athanasian Creed, the doctrinal foundation of historic Christian belief. The term creed derives from the Latin credo, meaning “I believe.” A creed, therefore, is an authoritative summary of essential Christian doctrine, developed within the life of the Church and confessed by the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic community of faith (cf. Ephesians 4:4–6). These statements are known as the “ecumenical creeds” because of their universal scope and their acceptance across the vast majority of Catholic, Protestant, and Eastern Orthodox traditions.

The Nicene Creed was composed chiefly in response to the teachings of Arius, whose doctrine—known as Arianism—denied the full divinity of the Son of God. Arius taught that Jesus Christ was a created angelic being, distinct in essence from the Father and the Holy Spirit. In order to address the intense controversy surrounding Christ’s nature, Constantine the Great convened the Council of Nicaea, where Arianism was formally refuted and condemned as heresy. Theologically, the Nicene Creed is structured around the doctrine of the Holy Trinity: the confession that there is one God in three coequal and coeternal persons—the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit (Matthew 28:19; 2 Corinthians 13:14). These three are one in power, glory, and divine essence (Deuteronomy 6:4; John 10:30). The original 325 AD formulation explicitly affirms that Jesus Christ is “begotten, not made” and “of one substance” (homoousios) with the Father—“very God of very God” (John 1:1; Hebrews 1:3).

In the sixth century, certain Latin‑speaking churches added the term filioque (“and the Son”) to the description of the Holy Spirit’s procession, asserting that the Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son (John 15:26). This addition was received in the Western Church but rejected by the Eastern Orthodox Church, which maintains that the Spirit proceeds from the Father alone as the fons divinitatis (“fount of deity”). The dispute over the filioque clause became one of the principal factors contributing to the East–West Schism and remains a point of theological discussion to this day. The inclusion of the phrase “and the Son” was intended to safeguard the full deity of Christ, who is confessed as coequal and coeternal with the Father (John 5:23; Philippians 2:6).

The Nicene Creed is accepted by the overwhelming majority of orthodox Christians as an authoritative confession of faith. It is rejected, however, by certain non‑Trinitarian groups, such as Jehovah’s Witnesses and Latter‑day Saints. Historically, the Nicene Creed has also been known as the “symbol of faith,” reflecting its role as a unifying confessional document and a token of Christian identity throughout the world. As R. B. Kuiper observes, “The doctrine of the Trinity [taught by the symbol of faith] is basic to the Christian religion. It is no exaggeration to assert that the whole of Christianity stands or falls with it.” It is the distinguishing doctrine of the Christian faith and the foundation of its uniqueness. J. I. Packer similarly affirms, “The Trinity is the basis of the Gospel, and the Gospel is a declaration of the Trinity in action” (cf. John 3:16–17; Ephesians 1:3–14).

1.     We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of Heaven and Earth, and of all things visible and invisible.

The first article of the Nicene Creed concerns the doctrine of God, known in dogmatics as theology proper. The word theology derives from the Greek theos (“God”) and logia (“the doctrine” or “study” of God). Although the Creed focuses specifically on the person of the Father as the “Maker of heaven and earth,” creation may rightly be described as the work of all three persons of the Godhead (cf. Genesis 1:1–2; John 1:1–3; Colossians 1:16). The Nicene Creed begins by affirming monotheism—the belief that God is one. While some religions, such as Hinduism, teach a plurality of gods and goddesses, and ancient Greek and Roman religions embraced polytheism, Christianity proclaims that there is only one God. The Shema prayer encapsulates the essence of Judeo‑Christian faith: “Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD” (Deuteronomy 6:4). Scripture repeatedly affirms this truth: “I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me” (Isaiah 45:5); “I am the first, and I am the last; and besides me there is no God” (Isaiah 44:6). The First Commandment likewise teaches exclusive devotion to the one true God: “Thou shalt have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:3). In the New Testament, Paul writes, “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy 2:5).

These affirmations raise important questions about the essence of God. Scripture teaches that God is, by nature, a most pure and holy Spirit: “God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth” (John 4:24). The Westminster Shorter Catechism famously defines God as “a Spirit, infinite, eternal, and unchangeable in his being, wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness, and truth” (Q&A 4). As Spirit, God does not possess a body and is not composed of parts; he is simple rather than composite. He exists beyond the limitations of the physical world. He is infinite—without boundaries or limits—and transcends space and time as Lord of heaven and earth (cf. 1 Kings 8:27; Psalm 139:7–10). He is eternal, existing outside of time, as a transtemporal being. In the words of the Psalmist, “Thou art the same, and thy years shall have no end” (Psalm 102:27). God has no beginning, middle, or end. He is unchanging, the same yesterday, today, and forever: “I am the LORD, I change not” (Malachi 3:6). As A. W. Pink observes, “God cannot change for the better, for He is perfect; and being perfect, He cannot change for the worse.” According to Stephen Charnock, the existence of God is the foundation of all religion. Scripture presupposes his existence from its opening words: “In the beginning God…” (Genesis 1:1). God is the great reality, an absolute personality, the Creator and Redeemer of humankind. He is infinitely wise and all‑knowing—omniscient (cf. Psalm 147:4–5). Isaac Watts captures this beautifully in poetic form:He formed the stars, those heavenly flames, He counts their numbers, calls their names; His wisdom’s vast, and knows no bound, A deep where all our thoughts are drowned.”

God is also almighty—omnipotent. “There is power in God to lay prostrate the whole world … whenever it may please him” (John Calvin). Scripture declares, “I am the Almighty God” (Genesis 17:1). He is also holy: “Holy, holy, holy is the LORD of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory” (Isaiah 6:3). “No attribute of God is more dreadful to sinners than his holiness” (Matthew Henry). The Father is holy, the Son is holy, and the Spirit is holy (cf. Revelation 4:8; Acts 3:14). Holiness is the very “Godness” of God; even sinless angels veil their faces before him (Isaiah 6:2). The more we approach true holiness, the closer we come to divinity. To be holy is to be divine. As a person grows in holiness—meaning Christlikeness, moral purity, love, humility, and alignment with God’s will—they increasingly reflect the character of God. They do not become divine, but they participate more fully in God’s life and the divine nature.

God is also just—scrupulously fair in all his dealings with humanity. “Whenever you hear the glory of God mentioned, think also of his justice” (Calvin). He always does what is right (cf. Deuteronomy 32:4). Whatever God does is just by virtue of his perfect nature. Yet he is not only just; he is also good. “O taste and see that the LORD is good” (Psalm 34:8). When the Lord revealed himself to Moses, he proclaimed his goodness, mercy, and steadfast love (Exodus 34:6–7). Scripture also declares, “God is love” (1 John 4:8). Annie Johnson Flint expresses this truth memorably: “His love has no limits, His grace has no measure, His power no boundary known unto men; For out of His infinite riches in Jesus, He giveth, and giveth, and giveth again.” Finally, God is faithful and true. “Nothing is deemed more precious by God than truth” (Calvin). He is the embodiment of truth. Jesus says, “I am the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6). Contra postmodernism, if God exists, truth exists, for he is the truth. Objective reality is grounded in the character of God.

The Nicene Creed defines God as the Creator of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible. Heaven may refer to the starry heavens above (Genesis 1:14–18) or the highest heaven where God dwells with his saints and angels (1 Kings 8:30; Hebrews 12:22). Earth encompasses everything beneath heaven. The visible includes what we can see, hear, smell, taste, and touch; the invisible includes the microscopically small and, more importantly, spiritual beings such as angels and demons (Hebrews 1:14; Ephesians 6:12). Christian theology teaches that God creates ex nihilo—“out of nothing.” He does not shape pre‑existing matter like a Platonic demiurge; rather, he brings all things into being by the power of his word: “For he spake, and it was done; he commanded, and it stood fast” (Psalm 33:9). “The creation is both a monument of God’s power and a looking glass in which we may see His wisdom” (Thomas Watson). “The heavens declare the glory of God” (Psalm 19:1). Creation testifies to its Creator. Paul affirms this in Romans: “The invisible things of him… are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made” (Romans 1:20). The fingerprints of God are imprinted on creation, leaving humanity without excuse on the Day of Judgment.

Two philosophical arguments relate to the doctrine of creation. The first is the cosmological argument, which asks why the universe exists at all. It is often expressed as follows: “Everything that begins to exist has a cause. The universe began to exist. Therefore, the universe has a cause.” This argument appeals to common‑sense causation and is supported by scientific evidence suggesting a cosmic beginning (e.g. the Big Bang Theory). Yet it raises questions about whether the first cause must be divine or whether an infinite regress is impossible. The second argument is from design,” also known as the teleological argument. Advocates of intelligent design argue that complexity, fine‑tuning, and order in the universe point to an intelligent designer. William Paley famously illustrated this with his watchmaker analogy in his book Natural Theology (1802). Modern versions of this argument note that physical constants are precisely calibrated for life; even minute changes would render the universe uninhabitable. Some argue that evolution by natural selection (as taught by Darwin in his book On the Origin of Species, 1859) explains biological complexity. Yet many theistic philosophers and Christian scientists accept progressive creationism, while also pointing to the irreducible complexity of biological systems such as molecular machines and mammalian cells. For example, the human cell is vastly more complex than Paley’s watch, yet we are asked to believe it arose by chance – this is something many Christians find difficult to accept. The telos of creation should evoke a sense of awe and wonder. This is what many Christians instinctively feel as they admire the beauty and intricacy of God’s creation. Creation should lead us to worship God in spirit and in truth. The hymnwriter captures this idea of Christian worship in a nutshell: “All creatures of our God and King, Lift up your voice and with us sing: Alleluia! Alleluia! Thou burning sun with golden beam, Thou silver moon with softer gleam, O praise Him, O praise Him, Alleluia! Alleluia! Alleluia!”

2.     And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten not made, consubstantial with the Father; by whom all things were made.

Christology stands at the very heart of the Nicene Creed: “We believe … in one Lord Jesus Christ.” The New Testament describes Jesus as Lord (kyrios), the Greek equivalent of the divine name YHWH. In other words, Jesus is YHWH—he is God (cf. Philippians 2:11; Romans 10:9–13). As Oswald Chambers observes, “The characteristics of God Almighty are mirrored for us in Jesus Christ. Therefore, if we want to know what God is like we must study Jesus Christ.” This is because the Son is “the brightness of the Father’s glory and the express image of his person” (Hebrews 1:3). Ambrose of Milan explains: “As the print of the seal on the wax is the express image of the seal itself, so Christ is the express image—the perfect representation—of God.” Jesus is also YHWH in relation to salvation. He is Jehovah Jesus. His name means “YHWH saves” or “the LORD is salvation.” The angel declares to Joseph concerning Mary: “Thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins” (Matthew 1:21). His title Christ (Christos) means “Messiah” or “Anointed One.” Jesus is the long‑awaited Messiah promised to Israel (cf. Psalm 2:2; John 1:41). As Messiah, he is anointed to the threefold office (munus triplex) of Prophet (munus propheticum), Priest (munus sacerdotale), and King (munus regium). The Heidelberg Catechism beautifully interprets the Messianic title in light of this threefold office: 

Why is He called Christ, that is, Anointed? Because He is ordained of God the Father, and anointed with the Holy Ghost, to be our chief Prophet and Teacher, who fully reveals to us the secret counsel and will of God concerning our redemption; to be our only High Priest, who by the one sacrifice of His body has redeemed us, and who continually intercedes for us before the Father; and to be our eternal King, who governs us by His Word and Spirit, and who defends and preserves us in the salvation He has purchased for us.” 

Christ is our Prophet, revealing the Father to us by his Word and Spirit (John 1:18; 14:24). He is our High Priest, offering himself as the perfect sacrifice for sin and continually interceding for us (Hebrews 7:25; 9:11–14). He is our eternal King, ruling and defending his people (Psalm 2:6; Revelation 19:16).

The Creed further describes Jesus as “the only begotten Son of God,” echoing the famous words of John 3:16. It affirms that the Son is eternally begotten of the Father— “begotten before all worlds.” As J. A. Bengel notes, “He who sees the Son sees the Father in the face of Christ. The Son exactly represents and reflects the Father.” This eternal “begetting” does not imply that Christ had a beginning. Rather, it expresses the Son’s eternal relationship to the Father. He is “begotten, not made”—not a creature, as Arius taught, but the Father’s coequal and coeternal Son (cf. John 1:1–2; 5:26). The Creed poetically describes the Son as “Light of Light.” The Father is the fons divinitatis, the fount of deity within the Trinity—not in time, but in eternity. Just as light radiates from the sun, so the Son eternally radiates from the Father. The Son is the radiance of the Father’s glory (Hebrews 1:3). The light that shines from the sun is of the same nature as the sun itself; likewise, the Son shares the same divine essence as the Father. William Bridge captures this truth: “God is best known in Christ; the sun is not seen but by the light of the sun.” The Creed continues by arguing that Jesus is “very God of very God.” John’s Gospel opens with the majestic declaration: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” (John 1:1–3). Jesus Christ is eternal God—already existing from before the creation of the world (John 8:58; Genesis 1:1; Proverbs 8:22–31). He is the Logos, the divine Word who perfectly expresses God’s nature and character (Colossians 1:15; Hebrews 1:3). He reveals the Father and his eternal purposes (John 1:18; 14:9). He was with the Father in a unique relationship from all eternity, distinct in person yet one in divine essence (John 17:5, 24). As such, he is the proper object of worship and adoration (John 20:28; Philippians 2:6; Revelation 5:12–14).

According to the Creed, the Son is consubstantial—“of one essence”—with God the Father. Jesus himself says, “I and my Father are one” (John 10:30). “He that hath seen me hath seen the Father” (John 14:9). “He that seeth me seeth him that sent me” (John 12:45). He also declares that “the Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do” (John 5:19). Paul affirms that Christ is “the image of the invisible God” (Colossians 1:15). The writer to the Hebrews says he is “the brightness of his glory and the express image of his person” (Hebrews 1:3). The Creed concludes this section by affirming that Christ is the one “by whom all things were made.” He is the Creator of the entire universe, including angels, demons, and humanity (John 1:10; Colossians 1:16–17; Hebrews 1:2, 10–12). In other words, Christ is not a created being—as Arius claimed—but the Creator himself. All things were made by him, through him, and for him – to the praise of his eternal glory.

3.     Who for us men, and for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Ghost and of the Virgin Mary, and was made man.

The prologue to John’s Gospel expresses the mystery of the incarnation with striking clarity: “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father), full of grace and truth” (John 1:14). These are words worthy of being written in gold. The Lord Jesus Christ truly became man—consubstantial with us according to his humanity. John’s language is deliberately down to earth: the eternal Word became flesh. He took on real human nature—meat, bone, blood, and sinew. He now possesses a human heart, a human brain, human organs, and a fully human physiology. He has a human mind, human emotions, and human affections. He is psychologically human in every way. He is “touched with the feeling of our infirmities,” being like us in every respect, yet without sin (Hebrews 4:15). He was born “in the likeness of sinful flesh” (Romans 8:3), yet remained himself personally sinless. Perfect God, perfect man. John Calvin captures this beautifully: “Christ voluntarily took upon himself everything that is inseparable from human nature.” He is at once very God of very God and truly man according to his human nature. He is God in the flesh—God veiled, as it were, under the covering of humanity. He is God incognito, as Luther famously taught.

The Creed gives the reason for the incarnation: “for us men and for our salvation.” Athanasius famously wrote, “Christ became what we are that He might make us what He is.” This Athanasian insight expresses the doctrine of theosis or divinization: what Christ has not assumed, he has not healed. Because he assumed the fullness of human nature, he is able to redeem humanity completely. By uniting human nature to his divine person, Christ ennobles and restores it, raising fallen humanity to communion with God and granting us adoption as sons and daughters of the Father (Galatians 4:4–7). Through union with Christ, believers become “partakers of the divine nature” (2 Peter 1:4). Christians are not merely called to follow God, but to be transformed into his likeness (Romans 8:29; 2 Corinthians 3:18) – to become imitators of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Given that Jesus Christ is truly man—with a true human heart—he is able to sympathize with us. Because he is truly God, he is mighty to save us. B. B. Warfield captures this dual truth magnificently: “The glory of the incarnation is that it presents to our adoring gaze not a humanized God or a deified man, but a true God‑man [Greek Theanthropos]—one who is all that God is and at the same time all that man is: one on whose almighty arm we can rest and to whose human sympathy we can appeal.” Christ remains fully human even now, after his ascension and during his heavenly session. Hebrews describes him as our Great High Priest who intercedes for us and who understands our weakness (Hebrews 4:14–16; 7:25). Jesus knows exactly what it is to be human. He understands our frailty, our temptations, our sorrows, and our limitations—yet he himself remained without sin.

Not only was Christ incarnate, but he was born of a virgin. Mary is known theologically as Theotokos—the “God‑bearer” or “mother of God.” She did not give birth to a mere human being, but to God the Son in human flesh (Luke 1:35). His humanity was taken from the Virgin Mary; his divinity is eternal, begotten of the Father before all ages. Thomas Watson writes, “As bread is made of wheat and wine is made of grapes, so Christ is made of a woman. His body was part of the flesh and substance of the virgin.” Jesus is fully God—consubstantial with the Father and the Spirit—and fully man, born of the Virgin Mary. These two natures exist in the one person of Christ “without confusion, without change, without division, and without separation,” as the Council of Chalcedon declared. The divine and human natures are not blended into a third thing, nor is Christ a hybrid being. There is no subtraction of divinity in the incarnation—only the addition of humanity. Jesus is not two persons or two Christs, but one person with two natures. These natures, once united, can never be divided. He is the God‑man for all eternity. The prophet Isaiah foretold the virgin birth centuries before its fulfilment: “Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel” (Isaiah 7:14). Mary was indeed a virgin when she conceived Jesus. She had never known a man. “Before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 1:18). The conception—not the birth—was miraculous. Jesus’ birth was entirely normal; his conception was entirely divine. Other passages affirm this truth (Matthew 1:22–25; Luke 1:26–27, 34–35). Jesus was conceived by the sovereign power of the Holy Spirit in the womb of a virgin—even Mary, the Mother of God. This mystery should evoke our deepest worship. Charles Wesley expressed it with poetic wonder: Let earth and heaven combine, Angels and men agree, To praise in songs divine, The incarnate Deity, Our God contracted to a span, Incomprehensibly made man.”

4.     He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate, and suffered, and was buried, and the third day He rose again according to the Scriptures, and ascended into heaven, and sits on the right hand of God the Father Almighty.

Pontius Pilate is, at first glance, a strange name to encounter in a creed concerned with Christian theology. Yet his inclusion serves a vital purpose: it anchors the crucifixion of Christ in real history. Jesus was crucified in the concrete reality of space and time, when Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea from approximately 26–36 AD under Emperor Tiberius (42 BC–AD 37). The truths of Christianity are fundamentally rooted in history. These things really happened. We are dealing with facts. They are not timeless myths or abstract spiritual principles, but events that unfolded in the real world as surely as any other historical fact. Jesus Christ suffered—He suffered degradation at the hands of both Roman and Jewish authorities (Mark 15:15; John 19:1–16). He was crucified—nailed to a cross—for human sin (1 Peter 2:24). As John Calvin memorably wrote, “There is no tribunal so magnificent, no throne so stately, no show of triumph so distinguished, no chariot so elevated as is the gibbet on which Christ has subdued death and the devil.” He was buried; they laid Him in a tomb (Matthew 27:59–60). He died in the reality of history. But He did not remain dead. On the third day He rose again, according to the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:3–8). The best news the world has ever heard came from a graveyard. As the hymnwriter Samuel Medley exults: “I know that my Redeemer lives! What joy the blest assurance gives! He lives, He lives, who once was dead; He lives, my everlasting Head!” Remember that these events took place while Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea. We are dealing with history here, not legend, not myth. As A. W. Tozer insisted, “The resurrection of Christ and the fact of the empty tomb are not [just] part of the world’s complex and continuing mythologies. This is not a Santa Claus tale – it is history, and it is reality.” The Nicene Creed therefore anchors our redemption in the realm of fact, not in mythology, or legend. Pilate’s name safeguards the truth that Christ died at a particular time, in a particular place, within a particular political context. The Christian gospel insists that salvation is not merely a theological idea but an historical event.

Regarding His death, the Creed insists that it was “for us” (Romans 5:8; Galatians 2:20). In other words, it was a substitutionary death. Jesus died in our place; He was condemned in the sinner’s stead (Isaiah 53:5–6). The crucifixion was not accident or a tragedy—it was the intentional, vicarious, and salvific sacrifice of the Son of God for the salvation of the whole world (John 10:15–18). Theologians have called this a penal substitutionary sacrifice. This means that Christ bears our guilt and suffers our punishment (2 Corinthians 5:21). It is penal in terms of Christ suffering our punishment. It is substitutionary in the fact that Christ takes our place. This does not exclude other biblical motifs. In the Christus Victor model, Christ defeats sin, death, and the devil (Colossians 2:15). In terms of moral suasion, the atonement also has an impact upon us as we behold divine love and respond with repentance and faith (1 John 4:9–11). In summary, the cross is God’s self-giving love in action, whereby He assumes the guilt of our sin and suffers the penalty due to us, bringing full redemption, pardon, and forgiveness to God’s elect people (Ephesians 1:7). As Cecil Frances Alexander wrote: “He died that we might be forgiven, He died to make us good; that we might go at last to heaven, saved by His precious blood.”

The Creed affirms the reality of Jesus’s suffering to counter early heresies such as Docetism, which denied His true humanity. If Christ were not truly human, He could not truly suffer. But He did suffer—physically, emotionally, and spiritually (Hebrews 4:15; Matthew 26:38). He knows the depths of human pain. He has been there. He understands your reality in this broken world. There is a profound solidarity between Christ and the believer in human suffering. His burial confirms that Jesus did not merely appear to die. He did not swoon or faint. He was confirmed dead and was buried (John 19:33–42). He faced death—the great enemy of humanity—and endured it for us (1 Corinthians 15:26). His burial sets the stage for His resurrection and victory over sin, death, and hell. But Jesus Christ did not stay dead. Praise God! He is not dead! On the third day He rose again (Luke 24:7). His resurrection was a historical event, witnessed and proclaimed by His disciples; a theological event, in which the Father vindicated the Son (Romans 1:4); and an eschatological event as the first fruits of the new creation and of the future resurrection of God’s people (1 Corinthians 15:20–23). All of this was “according to the Scriptures,” meaning it fulfilled God’s long-promised plan of redemption stretching back to the protoevangelium of Genesis 3:15: “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman…” The hymnwriter captures its essence: “Bruised was the dragon by the Son, Though two had wounds, there conquered One – and Jesus was His name” (William Williams, Pantycelyn).

Not only did Christ rise again—He also ascended into heaven (Acts 1:9–11). This was not His departure from humanity, for He sent the Holy Spirit to be with us (John 14:16–18), but His enthronement at the right hand of God. The ascension marks the transition from His earthly ministry (humiliation) to His heavenly kingship (exaltation). Jesus Christ is not an absent deity but an enthroned Saviour. He now sits at the right hand of God the Father Almighty (Hebrews 1:3). The right hand of God signifies power, rule, and honour (Psalm 110:1). Christ reigns over all earthly powers (Ephesians 1:20–22). His work of atonement is finished—He has sat down. He intercedes continually as High Priest for His redeemed people (Hebrews 7:25). He pours out the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:33). He rules and reigns over all as sovereign Lord of heaven and earth. My friends, we live in the day of grace, in the light of the resurrection, Jesus is not dead – He is alive, and by His Spirit He effectually applies redemption to our hearts (Titus 3:5; 1 Thessalonians 4:3). “In His life Christ is an example showing us how to live; in His death, He is a sacrifice satisfying for our sins; in His resurrection, a conqueror; in His ascension, a king; [and] in His intercession, a [great] High Priest” (Martin Luther).

5.     From thence He shall come again, with glory, to judge the living and the dead, and whose Kingdom shall have no end.

This article follows naturally from the previous one, showing its continuity with the theology already expounded. Jesus is said to come again “from thence”—that is, from the right hand of the Father (Acts 2:33; Hebrews 1:3). Though it has engendered much controversy, eschatology is an essential doctrine of the Christian faith. We must insist that Christ will come bodily a second time to judge the living and the dead (2 Timothy 4:1). The evangelical Bishop J. C. Ryle captures the contrast between Christ’s first advent (his humiliation) and His second advent (or exaltation) in a nutshell:

“The second coming of Christ shall be utterly unlike the first. He came the first time in weakness, a tender infant, born of a poor woman in the manger at Bethlehem, unnoticed, unhonoured, and scarcely known. He shall come the second time in royal dignity, with the armies of heaven around him, to be known, recognized, and feared, by all the tribes of the earth. He came the first time to suffer – to bear our sins, to be reckoned a curse, to be despised, rejected, unjustly condemned, and slain. He shall come a second time to reign – to put down every enemy beneath his feet, to take the kingdoms of this world for his inheritance, to rule them with righteousness, to judge all men, and to live forevermore.”

Christ will return from His present heavenly session to judge all humanity with justice and fairness. He will come from the right hand of God the Father Almighty, not from a place of obscurity or weakness as with his first advent. His second coming continues the theme of exaltation that includes His resurrection (Romans 1:4), ascension (Acts 1:9), and return in glory (Matthew 25:31) to judge the living and the dead. This means that Christ’s reign is ongoing—“already, but not yet”. He is already reigning in heaven at the right hand of God (1 Corinthians 15:25), but His Parousia is not yet fully accomplished. Christ will establish His kingdom throughout the world through the preaching of the Gospel (Matthew 24:14), through authentic revivals of religion as Jonathan Edwards famously taught, and through the establishment of His millennial kingdom on earth (Revelation 20:1–6) prior to his return. This belief in a post-millennial return of Christ was dubbed by Iain Murray as “the Puritan hope”, since many Puritan and Reformed divines believed that Christ would build His kingdom on earth spiritually through His reign in the hearts of His elect people prior to his bodily return in glory to judge the living and the dead. While you may differ with me on matters of eschatology, we can both agree to one certainty: Jesus is coming back with glory and power to judge all humanity.

Following the spiritual reign of Christ during the millennium, Jesus will return bodily to earth with glory. Where the first advent was marked by humility (Philippians 2:6–8), the second is marked by majesty (Revelation 19:11–16). His return will be: visible—not hidden, symbolic, or merely spiritual (Revelation 1:7); literal, physical, and bodily—from heaven to earth (Acts 1:11); majestic—displaying the splendor of the King (Titus 2:13); and vindicating—revealing who Christ is as the Lord of heaven and earth (Philippians 2:9–11). His return will not mark His abandonment of the world but the consummation of His redemptive work for the cosmos (Romans 8:19–23). He will restore all things and establish a new heaven and a new earth wherein righteousness dwells (2 Peter 3:13; Revelation 21:1–5). The purpose of His second coming will be “to judge the living and the dead.” In this regard, judgment is an essential part of the Gospel message (Acts 17:31). You cannot preach heaven without hell. Jesus is a most righteous and holy Judge (John 5:22). One day, everyone’s deeds will be brought to light (Romans 2:16). We shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ (2 Corinthians 5:10) and give an account for the way we have lived (Romans 14:12). Christ will judge fairly; none will go to everlasting perdition unjustly.

Jesus Christ, as the God‑Man, is perfectly righteous and perfectly compassionate (Hebrews 4:15). Those who have loved Him in life will reign with Him in glory (2 Timothy 2:12). While those who have rejected Him in life will be rejected by Him in death (Matthew 7:23). Jesus is not an unsympathetic Judge: as a real man, He knows the human condition from within. He is also the One who bore judgment for His people (Isaiah 53:5–6). To borrow an idea from the Swiss Reformed theologian Karl Barth, Jesus was the Judge judged in our place.” He knows what it is to come under the righteous indignation of a holy God, for He drank the cup of wrath of God to the dregs (Matthew 26:39; John 18:11). The phrase “the living and the dead” refers to all people universally—those who have died and those who are alive when Christ returns (1 Thessalonians 4:16–17). It speaks of equity: all will be measured by the same divine standard. It speaks of hope: wrongs will be righted, justice restored, and creation liberated from its bondage to corruption (Romans 8:21). Judgment is not merely punitive but also restorative. There is a new heaven and new earth awaiting those who have loved the Lord Jesus (Revelation 21:7). There is a heaven for believers, and a hell for the unrepentant and unregenerate (Matthew 25:46). Though it pains me even to mention it, Scripture nonetheless speaks of a place of outer darkness, where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth (Matthew 8:12), a lake of fire (Revelation 20:14–15), where the worm does not die and the fire is not quenched (Mark 9:48)—an eternal hell and final judgment for the reprobate, the devil, and all his angels (Revelation 20:10, 14–15). For the elect, there is eternal happiness with Christ in a kingdom that shall have no end (Luke 1:33).

The Nicene Creed reflects Daniel 7 and Luke 1:33 in its affirmation that the kingdom of the Son of God is an everlasting kingdom. It is unshakeable (Hebrews 12:28), universal—spanning heaven and earth (Psalm 103:19), and Life‑giving—marked by righteousness, peace, and joy (Romans 14:17). The tree of life will be there (Revelation 22:2), and the whole kingdom will be resplendent with holiness and everlasting joy. One hymnwriter says exquisitely: “The Lamb is all the glory in Immanuel’s land” (Anne Ross Cousin). Jesus is the heart of heaven. Those who have loved Jesus in life, will love him eternally in heaven. Frances Ridley Havergal beautifully expresses this eschatological hope: “Oh, the joy to see Thee reigning, Thee, my own beloved Lord! Every tongue Thy name confessing, Worship, honour, glory, blessing, Brought to Thee with glad accord—Thee, my Master and my Friend, Vindicated and enthroned, Unto earth’s remotest end, Glorified, adored, and owned!”

6.     And in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son, who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified, who spoke by the prophets.

The Calvinistic Baptist preacher Charles Haddon Spurgeon once remarked, “A dead creed is of no use; we must have our creed baptized with the Holy Ghost.” As we approach the doctrine of the Holy Spirit in the Nicene Creed, we must cultivate hearts that are receptive to the presence and work of the Holy Spirit. The true Christian is one born of the Spirit (John 3:5–8) and sanctified by the Spirit (1 Peter 1:2), whom the Lord Jesus sent into the world after His ascension (John 16:7). He is our Paraclete, our Comforter, Helper, and Friend in the work of the Gospel (John 14:16–17). The Nicene Creed reminds us that the Holy Spirit is not an impersonal force like gravity or electromagnetism. He is a divine Person. Scripture attributes to Him the qualities of personality such as intellect (1 Corinthians 2:10–11), will (1 Corinthians 12:11), emotion (Ephesians 4:30), and personal agency (Acts 13:2). To confess the Spirit is to confess the third Person of the Holy Trinity—fully and eternally God, yet personally distinct from the Father and the Son. The Creed describes the Spirit as “the Lord and Giver of Life.” In calling Him “Lord,” believers place Him unequivocally within the divine identity (2 Corinthians 3:17). Not only is He Lord, but He is also the Giver of Life, reflecting His role in creation, where He hovered over the waters and brought forth life (Genesis 1:2); in providence, where He sustains all living things (Psalm 104:30); and in redemption, where He regenerates and sanctifies God’s elect (Titus 3:5; Galatians 5:22–23). The Spirit gives life in every sphere—cosmic, ecclesial, and personal.

According to the Nicene Creed, the Holy Spirit “proceeds from the Father and the Son.” This refers to His timeless, personal origin within the Godhead. Just as the Son is eternally begotten of the Father, so the Spirit eternally proceeds from the Father and the Son (John 15:26; Galatians 4:6). There was never a time when God was without the Spirit, nor the Spirit without God. Procession is a relational, not a temporal, concept. It does not describe something that happened in the Spirit’s past, but who He eternally is in relation to the Father and the Son. Thus, the Spirit is coequal and coeternal with the Father and the Son. The Father is unbegotten; the Son is eternally begotten of the Father; the Spirit eternally proceeds from the Father and the Son. Scripture reveals this much about the inner life of the Triune God, though we confess these things to be deeply mysterious. It is a wise saying of the Dutch Reformed: “The knowledge of God is the knowledge of a mystery” (Herman Bavinck). The Creed continues: “Who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified.” Worship belongs to the Spirit because He is God. It is entirely appropriate for Christians to worship and glorify the Holy Spirit, though the ordinary pattern of prayer is to the Father, through the Son, in the power of the Spirit (Ephesians 2:18). The Spirit is not subordinate in essence; He is coequal in deity, coeternal in being, and shares the divine majesty with the Father and the Son (Matthew 28:19; Revelation 1:4). The Creed firmly rejects any form of subordinationism. The Holy Spirit is fully, truly, and eternally God, worthy of the Church’s worship, honour, and adoration.

The Creed also affirms that the Spirit “spoke by the prophets.” The Spirit is a speaking God—the divine author of Holy Scripture. The prophets of the Old Testament spoke as they were “carried along by the Holy Spirit” (2 Peter 1:21). Jesus promised that the Spirit would guide the apostles into all truth (John 16:13). In other words, the entire biblical canon is the work of the Spirit of God. Paul writes to Timothy, “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God” (2 Timothy 3:16). The Greek word theopneustos means “God‑breathed”—from Theos (God) and Pneuma (Spirit/Breath). Scripture is therefore the very breath of God the Holy Spirit. The words of the Bible are His words—His voice, His breath. Its authority derives from this divine origin. Spurgeon emphasised the necessity of the Spirit’s work in applying Scripture to the human heart: “Unless the Holy Spirit blesses the Word, we who preach the gospel are of all men most miserable … If the Holy Ghost does not regenerate them, we cannot … We might as well speak to the ear of a corpse.” The Spirit must effectually apply the Word of God to the souls of those who hear it. He must breathe life into dead sinners (Ezekiel 37:4–6). As Spurgeon said, “It were better to speak six words in the power of the Holy Ghost than to preach seventy years of sermons without the Spirit.” Only by the illumination of the Spirit of God can we rightly understand the Word of God (1 Corinthians 2:12–14). Only by His regenerating work can we see the kingdom of heaven (John 3:3–5). Only by His sanctifying power can we enter the holy place of God’s dwelling – for “without holiness no man shall see the Lord” (Hebrews 12:14).

7.     And in one holy catholic and apostolic Church; we acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins; we look for the resurrection of the dead, and the glorious life of the world to come. Amen.

The final article of the Nicene Creed gathers together several great theological themes: the identity of the Church, the importance of the sacraments, and the eschatological hope of all believers. It moves from the fellowship of the redeemed in the body of Christ, to the outward means of grace—such as baptism for the remission of sins—and finally to the consummation of all things at the end of the age. This section forms the Creed’s great doxological crescendo. The Creed begins by affirming that there is “One Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.” Outside of this Church there is no ordinary possibility of salvation. If we do not have the Church as our mother, we cannot have God as our Father – so St. Augustine famously argued. The two concepts (church + adoption) go hand in hand. This is not a sociological observation. The visible Church is divided into many denominations—Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic, and Protestant, along with Presbyterian, Methodist, Baptist, Congregationalist, Pentecostal, and Charismatic traditions. Yet the invisible Church, the whole company of God’s elect, is perfectly united in Christ, regardless of visible distinctions. Christ has one body (Ephesians 4:4), one bride (Revelation 19:7), and one flock under one Shepherd (John 10:16). The unity of the Church is not grounded in human organisation but in the Triune God who calls, gathers, and sanctifies His people. “Rabbi” John Duncan, the 19th‑century Scottish Presbyterian theologian, captured this idea beautifully: “I am first a Christian, next a Catholic, then a Calvinist, fourth a Paedobaptist, and fifth a Presbyterian. I cannot reverse the order.” Our identity in Christ must come first; denominational distinctives follow afterwards.

The Church is holy because she belongs to a holy God (1 Peter 2:9), because she is sanctified by the Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:11), and because she is called to live in holiness (Ephesians 1:4). Her holiness is both positional (in Christ) and progressive (in sanctification). “Catholic” means universal—the Church of all times and all places. It is the global community of saints spanning every nation, kindred, people, and tongue (Revelation 7:9; 5:9). Therefore, there is no room for racism, xenophobia, or prejudice in the Church of God. The church is fundamentally a multicultural institution. She proclaims the whole counsel of God (Acts 20:27) and makes disciples of all nations. She is not confined to any one culture, denomination, or historical period. The church is a globalised body of saints who love the Lord Jesus and confess his name. The Church is apostolic because she is built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets (Ephesians 2:20), she preserves the apostolic faith once delivered to the saints (Jude 3), and continues the apostolic mission (Matthew 28:18–20). From a Protestant perspective, apostolicity is defined not by historical succession alone but by doctrinal fidelity to the teaching of the apostles in Scripture. The Church is essential to Christian life. As Franklin Clark Fry observed, “A person who says he believes in God but never goes to church is like one who says he believes in education but never goes to school.” We must make every effort to attend the means of grace, hear the Word of God preached, partake of the sacraments, participate in prayer, and come under the discipline of the Word.

The Creed next affirms “one baptism for the remission of sins,” echoing Paul’s words: “One Lord, one faith, one baptism” (Ephesians 4:5). Baptism is the outward sign of inward grace—the sacrament of initiation into the Church and the seal of union with Christ. It signifies the washing away of sins (Acts 22:16), union with Christ in His death and resurrection (Romans 6:3–4), the gift of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38), and incorporation into the body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12:13) As J. C. Ryle notes, “Baptism is an ordinance of great simplicity … The inward part, or thing signified, is that washing in the blood of Christ, and inward cleansing of the heart by the Holy Ghost, without which no one can be saved." However, baptism does not work regeneration ex opere operato, as Roman Catholics and some High Church Anglicans maintain. It is an outward sign of the Spirit’s inward work—a visible token of the forgiveness of sins through the blood of Christ. It is a sign of grace, not grace itself. It is properly and dutifully administered to children of the covenant in Reformed churches.

The Creed concludes with the Church’s eschatological hope: “We look for the resurrection of the dead and the glorious life of the world to come.” Christians do not hope to be disembodied souls forever, but embodied saints in a renewed creation. We believe in the resurrection of the body—a literal, physical resurrection from the grave. As Christ was raised bodily, so shall believers be raised and glorified with Him. This hope was proclaimed by the prophets (Daniel 12:2) in the Old Testament and by Jesus (John 5:28–29) and Paul (1 Corinthians 15:42–44) in the New Testament. According to the apostles and prophets, the resurrection will be physical or bodily — the body raised imperishable; personal — the same person with the same identity is restored and glorified; and corporate — in that all humanity will be summoned before Christ as the Judge of the whole earth. According to the Creed, death is not the end of all being; it is the last enemy to be destroyed (1 Corinthians 15:26). The Creed concludes with the hope of “the life of the world to come.” This is not an ethereal or disembodied existence but a renewed creation—a new heavens and new earth wherein righteousness dwells (2 Peter 3:13; Revelation 21:1). It will shine with the radiance of God (Revelation 21:23), be free from death and sorrow (Revelation 21:4), and be filled with the glory of the Lamb (Revelation 22:3–4). It will be a place of rest, joy, and perfect peace—the full realisation of ‘shalom’ (Hebrews 4:9).

Conclusion

The Creed ends not with uncertainty, but with a loud “Amen!” – or “So let it be”. It is not merely an ancient formula from our patristic past but is a living and enduring confession that unites believers across all cultures, societies, centuries, and traditions. It certainly reflects the deep doctrinal awareness of the Church Fathers and the theological struggles of the early church in contending for the doctrine of the Trinity and the hypostatic union of the divine and human natures in the person of Christ. It offers a robust understanding of Christology and what it means to confess belief in a Triune God. Whether recited in a cathedral, a small gathering, or silently in prayer, the Creed speaks with a living voice and draws Christians back to the essential truths of the Gospel that transcend denominational barriers. To confess the Creed is to stand in continuity with generation upon generation of Christian believers engaging in a shared language of faith, grounding worship in robust theology, shaping ecclesiastical identity, and guarding the essential truths of the Gospel against error and heresy. The heart of the faith remains anchored in the same creedal confession: belief in God the Father Almighty, and in the Son Jesus Christ our Lord, and in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of Life – one God in three persons, forever. To whom be glory, honour, and dominion. World without end. Amen.

References & Recommended Reading

N.B. The theological works recommending in the following bibliography represent the best available literature to the Christian believer within the Protestant and Reformed Tradition. If you want to delve deeper into the theology of the Christian faith, I recommend you familiarize yourself with these particular works listed below – especially those highlighted with an asterisk.  

Allison, Greg R., Historical Theology: An Introduction to Christian Doctrine (Zondervan, 2011).

Barrett, Matthrew (ed.), On Classical Trinitarianism: Retrieving the Nicene Doctrine of the Triune God (IVP Academic, 2024).*

Barth, Karl, Dogmatics in Outline (SCM Press, 2001).

Barth, Karl, Evangelical Theology: An Introduction (Eerdmans, 1979).

Barth, Karl, The Epistle to the Romans (OUP, 1968).

Bavinck, Herman, Reformed Dogmatics (4 vols) (Baker Academic, 2003–08).*

Berkhof, Louis, Systematic Theology (Eerdmans, 1996).*

Bird, Michael F., Evangelical Theology: A Biblical and Systematic Introduction (Zondervan Academic, 2020).

Boettner, Loraine, The Reformed Doctrine of Predestination (Presbyterian and Reformed, 1932).

Bray, Gerald, God is Love: A Biblical and Systematic Theology (Crossway, 2012).

Calvin, John, The Institutes of the Christian Religion (Hendrickson, 2008).*

Charles Hodge, Systematic Theology (Hendrickson, 1999).

Charnock, Stephen, The Existence and Attributes of God (2 vols) (Crossway, 2022).

Dabney, R. L. Systematic Theology (Banner of Truth, 1985).

Daniel Curt, The History and Theology of Calvinism (Evangelical Press, 2020).

Dixhoorn, Chad Van (ed.), Creeds, Confessions, & Catechisms: A Reader’s Edition (Crossway, 2022).*

Ericson, Millard J., Christian Theology (Baker Academic, 2013).

Frame, John, Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Christian Belief (Presbyterian and Reformed, 2013).

Genderen, J. Van, and Velema, W. H., Concise Reformed Dogmatics (Presbyterian and Reformed, 2008).

Grudem, Wayne, Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (IVP, 2020).

Heppe, Heinrich, Reformed Dogmatics (Wakeman Classics, 2000).

Hoeksema, Herman, Reformed Dogmatics (2 vols) (Reformed Free Publishing Association, 2004–05).

Horton, Michael, The Christian Faith: A Systematic Theology for Pilgrims on the Way (Zondervan, 2011).*

Karkkainen, Veli-Matti, Christian Theology in the Pluralistic World: A Global Introduction (Eerdmans, 2019).

Letham, Robert, Systematic Theology (Crossway, 2019).*

Letham, Robert, The Holy Trinity: In Scripture, History, Theology, and Worship (Presbyterian and Reformed, 2004).

Lloyd-Jones, Martyn, Studies in the Sermon on the Mount (Eerdmans, 1959 – 60).

Machen, J. Gresham, Christianity and Liberalism (Macmillan, 1923).

Macleod, Donald, A Faith to Live By (Christian Focus, 1998).

McGrath, Alister E., and Matthew Thomas, Christian Theology: An Introduction (Wiley Blackwell, 2025).*

Milne, Bruce, Know the Truth: A Handbook of Christian Belief (IVP, 2009).

Muller, Richard A., Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics (4 vols) (Baker Academic, 2003–04).

Murray, Iain, The Puritan Hope: A Study of Revival and the Interpretation of Prophecy (Banner of Truth, 1975). 

Murray, John, Collected Writings (Banner of Truth, 1982).  

Murray, John, Redemption Accomplished and Applied (Eerdmans, 1955).

Needham, Nick, 2000 Years of Christ’s Power (5 vols) (Christian Focus, 1997–2021).

Packer, J. I., Fundamentalism and the Word of God (Eerdmans, 1958).

Packer, J. I., Knowing God (Hodder and Stoughton, 1973).

Pelikan, Jaroslav, The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine (5 vols) (University of Chicago Press, 1971–89).

Pink, A. W., The Sovereignty of God (Baker Book House, 1930).

Ryle, J. C., Holiness (James Clarke & Co., 1879).

Shedd, William G. T., Dogmatic Theology (Presbyterian and Reformed, 2003).

Stott, John, The Cross of Christ (IVP, 1986)

Thiselton, Anthony C., Systematic Theology (SPCK, 2015).

Turretin, Francis, Institutes of Elenctic Theology (Presbyterian and Reformed, 1992–97)

Van Til, Cornelius, An Introduction to Systematic Theology (Presbyterian and Reformed, 1997).

Vos, Geerhardus, Reformed Dogmatics: A System of Christian Theology (Lexham Press, 2012–16).

Watson, Thomas, A Body of Divinity (Banner of Truth, 1958).*

Webster, John, Kathryn Tanner, Iain Torrance (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Systematic Theology (OUP, 2007).

Whilhemus A Brakel, The Christian’s Reasonable Service (4 vols) (Reformation Heritage Books, 1992–95).*

Young, Edward J., Thy Word is Truth: Some Thoughts on the Biblical Doctrine of Inspiration (Banner of Truth, 1963).

Some Thoughts on Calvin’s Catechism (1537)

John Calvin’s first catechism was originally written in French in 1537 and subsequently in Latin in 1538. It does not take a question-and-answer format like many catechisms from the early modern period, but rather sets out doctrinal points in essay form. It is very much a pearl of great price and provides a concise introduction to his theology. Many associate John Calvin’s name with the doctrine of predestination and the absolute sovereignty of God. While it is true that Calvin did write about these themes, and is justly considered famous for them, his theology was actually more comprehensive than the topic of predestination alone and considered a wide range of theological topics including the doctrine of God, man, sin and death, the law of God, faith, justification, sanctification, repentance, regeneration, prayer, the sacraments of baptism and the Lord’s Supper, and the return of Christ. His first catechism provides a window into his understanding of theology as it should be taught to children and adults. This article will explore the salient themes in his catechism and offer commentary on his thought drawing upon the English edition of his catechism edited by James. T. Dennison, Jr.[1]

The Knowledge of God and of Man

Calvin begins his catechism by arguing that ‘all men are born in order to know God’ (p. 354). This is Calvin’s famous notion of the sensus divinitatis or the awareness of God shared by every human being. There is no such thing as an atheist as far as Calvin is concerned, just someone who is engaged in the business of supressing the knowledge of God revealed in his own constitution as a creature of God and as one made after the image and likeness of the divine being. Given this awareness of God, Calvin argues, ‘the principal care and solicitude of our life [must] be to seek God, to aspire to him with all the affection of our heart, and to repose nowhere else but in him alone’. (p. 354). As St. Augustine famously said, our hearts are restless until their find their rest in God.[2] Calvin distinguishes between true and false religion in the heart and argues that true religion or piety consists ‘in a pure and true zeal which loves God altogether as Father, and revers him truly as Lord, embraces his justice and dreads to offend him more than to die’ (p. 355). Such is the holiness which God requires of humankind.

What must we know of God? Calvin lists several divine attributes of God – his immortality, his great power, his wisdom, his goodness, his justice, and his mercy. Humankind was originally created after the image and likeness of God, but fell into sin to the extent that the ‘intellect of man is indeed blinded, wrapped with infinite errors and always contrary to the wisdom of God; the will, bad and full of corrupt affections, [which] hates nothing more than God’s justice; and the bodily strength, incapable of all good deeds, tends furiously toward iniquity’ (p. 357). This is known as the doctrine of total depravity in the acronym for five-point Calvinism, TULIP. The others which summarise Calvinistic teaching are unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace, and perseverance of the saints. The acronym would not find widespread use until the twentieth century, and some find the specific terminology unhelpful – preferring to speak of definite atonement or particular redemption and effectual calling rather than irresistible grace. Calvin affirms that human beings in the state of sin have no ‘free power’ of choosing between good and evil – or what is commonly known as the freedom of the will. Calvin argues that man is a sinner by nature and a slave to sin: ‘man’s spirit is so alienated from the justice of God that man conceives, covets, and undertakes nothing that is not evil, perverse, iniquitous, and soiled’ (p. 357). It is not that man sins by compulsion, but according to his sinful desires. He wants to sin and delights in wickedness. Human beings sin because they are sinners both by nature and by choice, and the wages and consequences of which are divine retribution, judgement, and everlasting death.

The Moral Law of God

However, according to Calvin, God in his mercy chooses to redeem a great multitude of sinners of lost humanity by his grace and mercy: ‘[God] recalls us from error to the right way, from death to life, from ruin to salvation, from the kingdom of the devil to his own reign’ (p. 358). God first stings our conscience with the severity of the law to reveal our utter helplessness in the state of sin and then offers the healing balm of the Gospel which sweetens the law with love and grace. The moral law reveals sin and drives the sinner to Christ for mercy – it has evangelical and Gospel purposes. It is the schoolmaster to bring us to Christ. The law in Exodus 20 was given in the context of grace: ‘I am the Lord thy God, who has gotten thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of slavery. Thou shalt not have other gods in my presence’ (Exodus 20:2). God redeemed Israel from the hand of the Egyptians and brought them into a state of freedom – and this before he gave them the moral law. Grace precedes giving of the law in Scripture. There was grace in Eden before there was condemnation. The first commandment teaches us to worship God alone, to rest ourselves in him with all our reliance and hope, to acknowledge that all good and holy things come from him alone, and to praise him for all goodness and holiness.

The second commandment instructs us against the making of any images or representations of the divine – which Calvin connects to the doctrine of John 4:23 which teaches that God is a most pure and holy spirit and must be worshipped in spirit and in truth. He has no body or parts that we should represent him. He is the invisible God. In the context of the Reformation, Calvin takes aim at the Roman Catholic veneration of images and reminds us ‘how gravely the transgression of this commandment offends him’. (p. 360). The third commandment teaches us never to take the name of the Lord in vain. In the broadest sense, this commandment forbids all profane and foul language, but especially takes issue with those who blaspheme the sacred and holy name of God. When we approach the Father, we must do so with reverence and grace upon our lips. Calvin views the sabbath as an ordinance fulfilled in Christ: ‘He is the truth by the presence of which all images vanish’ (p. 360). Christians should not be bound by the superstitious observance of days as in the Roman Catholic Church. This is not to say there is no place for the Sabbath in the Christian life, but that we should not be unduly legalistic about the matter: ‘Hence, although the Sabbath is abrogated, it so happens among us that we still convene on certain days in order to hear the word of God, to break the [mystic] bread of the Supper, and to offer public prayers; and, moreover, in order that some relaxation from toil be given to servants and workingmen’ (p. 361).

Calvin commends the fifth commandment to us that we must honour our mother and father and all those ‘who are likewise constituted above us, such as princes and magistrates’ (p. 362). For this reason, the Protestant Reformation has sometimes been described as the ‘Magisterial Reformation’ which includes the Lutheran, Calvinist, and Anglican churches who allowed some role for the secular authorities or magistrates in the life of the church. This contrasts with the radical Reformation whose members often shunned the authority of the state. The sixth commandment forbids murder and all violence and injury towards our neighbours who are made in the image and likeness of a holy God. The seventh commandment forbids ‘any kind of lewdness and immodesty’ and encourages the practice of faithful marriage between husband and wife. The eighth commandment forbids theft and all kinds of fraud – we must respect our neighbours’ rights, property, and goods. The ninth commandment forbids false witness against our neighbour and all forms of malicious gossip. The final commandment forbids covetousness and evil desire. According to Calvin, the sum of this commandment means that ‘we must be so affectionate that we are no longer even solicited by any cupidity [i.e. greed] contrary to the law of love, and ready to render most willingly to each one that which is his’ (p. 364). The avarice and greed of modern capitalism would have been wholly alien and odious to Calvin who believed that all things ultimately belong to God. The sum of the whole law according to Christ is ‘that we should love the Lord our God with all our heart, with all our soul, and with all our strength. And the second article is that we should love our neighbour as we love ourselves’ (p. 364). Love summarises and fulfils the law.

The law has an evangelical function to lead us to Christ. Though it convinces us of inequity and transgression, it is designed to drive us towards Christ for mercy: ‘It is in Christ his Son that God shows himself to us benevolent and propitious … in Christ his face shines full of grace and kindliness even toward miserable and unworthy sinners; for, he gave this admirable example of his infinite love, when he exposed his own Son for us, and in him opened to us all the treasures of his clemency and goodness’ (p. 365). We lay hold of this Christ through faith. ‘Just as the merciful Father offers us the Son through the word of the Gospel, so we embrace him through faith and acknowledge him as given to us’ (p. 365). Christ is freely offered towards sinners in all his fullness in the Gospel, but it is only believers who apprehend and receive him by faith. At the back of faith, however, stands God’s eternal purpose of election or predestination. Without the foreknowledge and predestination of God, none would ever come to Christ or make the first step towards him. ‘For, if he willed to ruin all mankind, he has the right to do it, and in those whom he rescues from perdition one can contemplate nothing but his sovereign goodness. We acknowledge, therefore, the elect to be recipients of his mercy (as truly they are) and the rejected to be the recipients of his wrath, a wrath, however, which is nothing but just’ (p. 366). The fact that God chooses to save anybody is a testimony to his grace and favour. He would have been perfectly just to condemn all humankind to eternal misery, yet he chose in grace to save some – his elect people in Christ Jesus.

Faith and Repentance

What is the nature of true faith? According to Calvin, ‘Faith is a firm and solid confidence of the heart, by means of which we rest surely in the mercy of God which is promised to us in the Gospel’ (p. 367). He ties this to the definition of faith offered by the writer to the Hebrews who argues that faith is the certainty the things to be hoped for and the demonstration of things not seen (Hebrews 11:1). This element of a certain hope seems to be the essence of faith in Calvin’s system. On this point, he may be said to differ somewhat from the English Puritans who correctly argued that assurance was not the essence of faith and who distinguished between strong and weak faith in believers. However, Calvin and the Puritans were agreed on one point: faith should not be seen as a ‘good work’, but as a ‘good gift’ from the hand of God. Salvation is all of grace (sola gratia) and not of works lest any man should boast. Calvin, in agreement with Martin Luther, argues that we are justified in Christ alone (solus Christus) through faith alone (sola fide). We are not declared right before God on the basis of our own merits and works, but on the basis of Christ’s absolute righteousness which is credited or imputed to our account. Justification is a forensic term and has to do with our legal standing before God. We are either guilty in Adam or justified in Christ. There is no middle ground. Sanctification, however, must be properly distinguished from justification. It is a work that follows justification and remains an unfinished work during this life until we are glorified with Christ. It is progressive, rather than declarative. Sanctification also comes to us by faith and through the grace of God in Christ. As Calvin argues, ‘Observance of the Law, therefore, is not a work that our power can accomplish, but it is a work of a spiritual power. Through this spiritual power it is brought about that our hearts are cleansed from their corruption and are softened to obey unto righteousness’ (p. 369). We are not sanctified by our own strength or efforts, but by the strength and efforts of the Holy Spirit working in us by his grace. The law becomes sweet and holy to us, and we desire to keep God’s commandments as a rule of life because of the Spirit of grace at work within us.

Calvin argues that repentance follows faith in the Christian life and becomes a continual habit until glorification. ‘This repentance depends upon regeneration, which has two aspects, that is to say: the mortification of our flesh, that is, a killing of our inborn corruption; and the spiritual vivification through which man’s nature is restored to integrity’ (p. 370). Believers are called to die to sin and to live for Christ for the glory and honour of God alone (soli deo gloria). Those who are justified by faith are also sanctified by God’s grace. They must kill sin, or it will kill them. ‘We must, therefore, meditate during all our life on the fact that, being dead unto sin and our former selves, we may live unto Christ and his righteousness’ (p. 370). Good works are the fruit of sanctification, but never the cause or ground of our justification. They have no merit before God and are always tainted with the stain of sin in our lives. We always need Christ to wash and sanctify our good deeds in order for them to be acceptable before the Father. ‘We always need Christ, so that his perfection may cover our imperfection, [so that] his purity may wash our impurity, his obedience may efface our iniquity; and finally his righteousness may … credit us with righteousness’ (p. 371). We are only ever presentable to the Father when we are washed in the blood of Christ and clothed in his righteousness divine.

The Apostles’ Creed

Calvin walks the reader step by step through the Apostles’ creed which he describes as the symbol of our faith. This symbol adopts a tripartite formula and invites the reader to consider the work of the one true God as Holy Trinity. For within the one divine being, there are three co-equal and co-eternal persons: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. And these three are one God, equal in power and in glory. God the Father is the Almighty who by his great power brought the earth and heavens into being. God the Son is our Lord and Saviour. And God the Holy Spirit is the Lord and Giver of life. Jesus Christ is Lord both according to his divinity and according to his humanity whereby he rules and defends us. He was conceived by the Holy Spirit and born of the virgin Mary. His conception was the work of God the Holy Spirit in the womb of the holy virgin and mother of God. This was to preserve Christ from all taint of original sin and mark his eternal divinity as the Son of God. He was also born of the virgin Mary and adopted by Joseph in order that he should be known as ‘the true Son of Abraham and of David, who had been promised in the law and the prophets, and as true man, in all things similar to us except only in sin’ (p. 373). Jesus Christ is very God of very God according to the divinity, and he is truly man – bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh – according to the humanity, in every way like unto us, yet without sin. He suffered under Pontius Pilate and was crucified by the Romans at the request of the Sanhedrin. He died, was buried, and descended into hell. According to Calvin, ‘He has shed his sacred blood for the price of our redemption in order to extinguish the wrath of God inflamed against us and to purge away our iniquity’ (p. 373). His death and descent into hell secured our atonement once and for all. Calvin quite clearly views the death of Christ in terms of penal substitution and vicarious satisfaction. It is worth quoting Calvin at length on this point:

He has been crucified in order to bear upon the cross ... our curse which our sins deserved. He died in order to conquer by his death the death which was against us and in order to swallow that death which otherwise would have swallowed and devoured us all. He has been buried in order that we too ... [might] be buried unto sin, being freed from the power of the devil and of death (p. 374).

Here Calvin comes close to expressing the title that would later by penned by the English Puritan John Owen – The Death of Death in the Death of Christ (1648) – so accurately capturing the nature of Christ’s death for us. In terms of Christ’s descent into hell, Calvin understands this difficult phrase to mean his suffering of the undiluted wrath of God against human sin upon the cross, rather than any literal descent into the abode of the dead.

The third day, Christ rose from the dead. After being seen by many witnesses, he ascended into heaven, and sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on High, even God the Father Almighty – and from heaven he will come again with glory to judge the living and the dead. He is no longer dead and death itself has been swallowed up in victory. There is a man in the glory – a man of human bones and flesh with teeth, nails, hair, and skin, with human organs, a human brain, a human mind, human affections, and a human heart. Christ has ascended into heaven and sat down. His work of atonement is finished. He is at the right hand of his Father making intercession for his elect people before the throne of grace. And one day he will come again with glory as judge of the whole earth. None shall escape the rod of his judgement. He will break the teeth of the wicked and condemn those to hell who have lived unrepentant lives before his Father in heaven. But the elect he shall fully and finally save at last, transforming their earthly bodies to be like his heavenly body, glorified and free from sin forever in a world of righteousness and peace.

The creed turns towards a consideration of the person and work of God the Holy Spirit. ‘By the power of the Spirit, Christ makes, upholds, maintains, and vivifies all things; by [the Spirit] he justifies, sanctifies, and purifies, calls and attracts us to himself in order that we may obtain deliverance’ (p. 375). In other words, the Holy Spirit applies the work of redemption to the hearts of the elect – enflaming them with love to God and love to humanity. The church universal and the communion of the saints come together under the Lordship of Christ and his Holy Spirit. There is one living head of the church – namely Christ – and those sanctified in the Spirit belong to his body and function together as various parts. The church is catholic or universal and found in every part of the world, united together by Christ. The church is holy, having been sanctified by the Holy Spirit, bound in one sacred holy communion or fellowship and united in one faith, one hope, one charity, and one inheritance of eternal life. The elect in this one holy and universal church believe in the remission of sins – ‘not through any merit of their own, but through the sole mercy of the Lord’ (pp. 376–77). Outside of this fellowship with Christ and his people, there is no forgiveness for sin. In the words of St. Cyprian, if we would have God as our Father, then we must have the church as our mother.[3]

The incredible news of the creed is that there is forgiveness for all our transgressions in the blood, righteousness, and satisfaction of Christ. The symbol closes with a reference to the resurrection of the body and the glorious life of the world to come. ‘It will so happen that the Lord will call back from the dust and from corruption to a new life the flesh of those who have been consumed by death before the day of judgement. And it shall be so through the one same power by which he has resuscitated his own Son from the dead’ (p. 377). Death is not the end of all being. We were created for eternity and God has stamped eternal life in our hearts. The reprobate will be raised in the misery of his sins to face the final judgement and the lake of fire for all eternity, where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth, where the worm never dies and the fire does not go out, and where the smoke of their torment rises forever. The elect, however, will be raised in glory with exceeding joy and the eternal happiness of a new heaven and a new earth wherein righteousness dwells. Heaven is a place of love where we shall see his glory – not as in a mirror darkly – but face to face. Believers have a great hope in Christ. According to Calvin, ‘Hope is nothing else than the expectation of the things that faith has believed to be truly promised by God’ (p. 378). Every true believer should be an optimist about the future, since we have a certain hope of redemption in the Lord Jesus Christ – both body and soul – for all eternity.

The Lord’s Prayer

Believers are called to seek God and ask our petitions in prayer. The Lord Christ gave us a model prayer to use and reflect upon in personal devotion. ‘Prayer’, according to Calvin, ‘is similar to a communication between God and us whereby we expound to him our desires, our joys, our sighs, [and] in a word, all the thoughts [and meditations] of our hearts’.(p. 379). In other words, prayer is communion with God. The Lord’s Prayer is made up of six petitions. The first three petitions focus on God and his glory, while the latter three consider the needs of our humanity. Prayer requires knowledge both of God and humanity – and much as Calvin begins his Institutes of the Christian Religion with the knowledge of God and of mankind, so must we begin our prayer life with an awareness of the power of God and the plight of man. Our prayers must be offered to God as our Father in the name of Christ. Prayer in any other name than the name of Christ is wholly displeasing and odious to God. Observe that we are to pray to our Father who art in heaven. According to Calvin, ‘His marvellous majesty … is thus signified, inasmuch as there is nothing before our eyes more excellent and full of all majesty than the sky. The phrase in heaven is equivalent to saying that God is lofty, mighty, [and] incomprehensible’ (p. 381).

The first petition reminds us of the absolute sanctity of the divine name: hallowed be thy name. ‘The name of God is the renown whereby he is celebrated among men for his virtues, as are his wisdom, goodness, might, justice, truth, [and] mercy’ (p. 380). When we remember God’s name, it is fitting also to remember his attributes and gracious character – that we approach him as our Father, and not as a tyrant. The second petition looks to the coming and advancement of God’s kingdom on earth: ‘We pray, therefore, that God’s reign may come, that is to say, that the Lord may from day to day multiply the number of his faithful believers who celebrate his glory in all works, and that he may continually spread on them more largely the affluence of his graces, whereby he may live and reign in them more and more, until, having perfectly conjoined them to himself, he may fill them wholly’ (p. 382). The kingdom of God is already present on earth, but it is not yet finally consummated as it shall be at the last day. Therefore, we pray that his kingdom may come and that our Lord might reign and put all his and our enemies beneath his feet. The already/not yet eschatological dynamic in Calvin’s approach to prayer reminds us to be optimistic and hopeful as Christians about the future of the church and God’s righteous kingdom. The third petition concerns itself with the divine will in heaven and earth. God’s will in heaven is the pattern for his rule upon earth. He desires that all should keep his will even as the elect angels in heaven observe and do all that God requires of them. The will of man should be wholly and utterly subservient to the divine will so ‘that we wish nothing from ourselves, but that his Spirit may will in us, through whose inspiration we may learn to love all things pleasing to him and to hate and to detest all that which displeases him’ (pp. 382–83).

The fourth petition turns to a consideration of our bodily needs: give us today our daily bread. That we need sustenance, water, and nourishment is part of our condition as being human beings. Even Adam needed to eat fruits and vegetables in Paradise and was to look for the Lord’s hand and provision in this regard. ‘And we must have this trust that, when our Father shall have nourished us today, he will not fail us tomorrow either’ (p. 383). As far as Calvin is concerned, all private property belongs ultimately to God – not even sources of nourishment generated by our own labour and industry belong to us – since all things belong ultimately to God and are rightfully his, and they are given to us in grace, freely and without necessity by his fatherly hand. The fifth petition encourages us to pray for the forgiveness of our sins, even as we learn to forgive others who have sinned against us. Those who harbour grudges against their enemies have never truly experienced forgiveness for their own sins against God and humanity. But those who have been forgiven much, love much and forgive others for their trespasses as freely as God forgives those who have sinned against his awful majesty. The sixth petition of the Lord’s prayer urges us to pray against temptation and Satan’s devices. As Calvin points out, we are not so much asking for no temptations in life, but rather that we would be ‘waked up, stimulated, and agitated for fear that through too long a rest we become too soft and lazy’ (p. 384). According to the Holy Scriptures, we have an enemy – the evil one – even Satan who opposes us and we must be ready with remedies against his devices to ensnare us and to lead us into temptation and sin. We must cast ourselves wholly upon the arm of God in prayer to resist the devil – and the devil seeing the power and promises of God will flee before us – that ‘we may remain invincible above the devil, death, and all the weapons of hell’ (p. 384). And the danger of temptation is a constant reminder for the need of perseverance in prayer and the duty we have to pray without ceasing. Prayer is not a one off, or a quick fix, or a pick me up, it is a sacred and holy act of communion with God. We approach God as our hallowed Father with due reverence, love, and fear.

The Sacraments and Church Order

Calvin closes his catechism with a consideration of the sacraments of baptism and holy communion. What is a sacrament? According to Calvin, ‘A sacrament is an external sign through which the Lord presents and testifies to us his good will towards us in order to sustain us in the weakness of our faith … It is a testimony of the grace of God declared by an external sign’ (p. 386). Contrary to the claims of the Roman Catholic Church, there are only two sacraments according to the Scriptures and the witness of Christ, namely baptism and the Lord’s Supper. Baptism is an outward sign of inward grace. It is a public declaration that we belong to God and are numbered among his covenant people. The Lord has commanded that his own church be ‘sanctified through her bridegroom [namely Christ] and cleansed through the washing of water unto the word of life’ (p. 386). Calvin argues that we rightly baptise the children of believers ‘since they are already participants in the eternal covenant through which the Lord promises that he will be God not only of us, but also of our posterity’ (p. 387). In the New Covenant, baptism is the sign of God’s eternal promise to be faithful to his people, even as circumcision was the sign of the covenant under the Old Testament – and therefore was rightly administered to children. The signs of the Supper of the Lord or Holy Eucharist are ‘the bread and wine, under which the Lord presents to us the true yet spiritual communication of his body and blood’ (p. 387). This is not to say that the elements of the Lord’s Supper literally become the body and blood of Christ, but rather that they signify these elements of Christ’s death to us as we feed upon him crucified, dead, and buried for us. According to Calvin, ‘He gives us in the supper an instruction concerning this matter so certain and manifest that without any doubt we must be assured that Christ with all his riches is there presented to us, not less than if he could be put in the presence of our eyes and be touched by our hands’ (p. 387). This is not to say that we literally masticate the body and blood of Christ as the Roman Catholic Church insists, but that we partake of Christ spiritually by faith and under the direction of his word.

Calvin closes with a consideration of the pastors of the church and their power, the place of human traditions, the role of church discipline and excommunication, and the relationship between the magistrate or civic officer and the church. Since God has ordained that the word and sacraments be administered to his people, it is necessary for the church to appoint pastors and teachers for the flock – such who are pure in doctrine privately and publicly, prayerful in the administration of the sacraments, and who by their good example and teaching instruct God’s people to live lives of holiness and purity. They bind and loose as Christ teaches by the power and under the authority of his word. ‘For the sum of the Gospel is that we are slaves of sin and death, and that we are loosed and freed by the redemption which is in Christ Jesus, while those who do not receive him as redeemer are bound as by new bonds of a graver condemnation’ (pp. 388–89). Pastors and teachers however have no more authority than such as is given to them in the Holy Scriptures. The power to bind and loose is wholly contained in the word of God and not in the office of pastor itself. As Calvin argues,

Let pastors boldly dare all things by the word of God, of which they have been constituted dispensators; let them constrain all the power, glory, and haughtiness of the world to make room for and to obey the majesty of that word; let them by means of that word command all from the greatest to the smallest; let them edify the house of Christ; let them demolish the reign of Satan; let them feed the sheep, kill the wolves, instruct the docile; let them rebuke, reprove, reproach, and convince the rebel – but all through and in the word of God (p. 389).

Notice how carefully Calvin ties the authority of pastors and teachers to the word of God as given in the Holy Scriptures alone (sola scriptura). Should a pastor or teacher exceed the divine word or turn away from what God commands in Holy Scripture, then they must be seen as ‘pernicious wolves’, who must be chased away from the flock of God.

Human traditions are to be allowed in the church only in so far as they conform to the word of God and are edifying for the body. Traditions which upset, distort, undermine, or turn away from the Scriptures are to be rejected. What may be reasonably deduced from the Scriptures for our edification is permitted as necessary, but we should be careful not to ensnare ourselves in the commandments and legalities of men. According to Calvin, excommunication is the act whereby those who are manifestly sinful without repentance or desire to reform their lives are excluded from the membership of the church and are subject to proper discipline. Although this may seem harsh to modern readers, it is actually a kindness to graciously admonish and rebuke the wicked so that they may see their sins and repent of them in order that they might be welcomed back into the fold of God, but only when there is clear evidence of their true faith and repentance. As Calvin says, ‘When this result is obtained, the church with kindliness will receive them again in her communion and in the participation of that union from which they had been excluded’ (p. 390). Discipline is a necessary kindness for the health and wellbeing of the church. However, we are not to sit in pharisaical judgement of others, but kindly and with grace show them their sins in the mirror of the law and lead them back to Christ for mercy, knowing that we ourselves are sinners saved by grace. God welcomes repentant prodigals with open arms and fatherly love. The civil magistrates are to be obeyed in so far as they uphold the word of God. They are called by God to ‘keep in true purity the public form of religion, to establish and to guide the life of the people by good laws, and to procure the welfare and the tranquillity of their subjects, both in public and in private’ (p. 391). For this work, civil magistrates require both justice and judgement: ‘Justice is to safeguard the innocent, to maintain, to keep, and to free them; judgement is to resist the audacity of evil men, to repress violence, and to punish misdeeds’.(p. 391). It is the duty of subjects to obey those in authority over them and to render unto Caesar what belongs to Caesar and to God what belongs to God.

Select Bibliography

There is a wealth of literature out there on Calvin and Calvinism. The following titles include material about John Calvin and his theology, but also about how Calvinism emerged and developed as a distinct tradition after his death in 1564.

Benedict, Philip, Christ’s Churches Purely Reformed: A Social History of Calvinism (Yale, 2002).

Daniel, Curt, The History and Theology of Calvinism (Durham, 2019).

Dennison, Jr., James T., Reformed Confessions of the 16th and 17th Centuries in English Translation, 4 vols (Grand Rapids, MI, 2008–2014).

Gordon, Bruce, and Carl Trueman (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Calvin and Calvinism (Oxford, 2021).

Gordon, Bruce, Calvin (New Haven and London, 2011).

Hart, D. G., Calvinism: A History (New Haven and London, 2013).

Lehner, Ulrich L., Richard A Muller, A. G. Roeber (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Theology, 1600–1800 (Oxford, 2016).

Muller, Richard A., After Calvin: Studies in the Development of a Theological Tradition (Oxford, 2003).

Muller, Richard A., Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics: The Rise and Development of Reformed Orthodoxy, ca. 1520–1725, 4 vols (Grand Rapids, MI, 2003).

Muller, Richard A., The Unaccommodated Calvin: Studies in the Foundation of a Theological Tradition (Oxford, 2000).

Wallance, Jr., Dewey D., Shapers of English Calvinism 1660–1714: Variety, Persistence, and Transformation (Oxford, 2011).

Wendel, Francois, Calvin: The Origins and Development of His Religious Thought (New York, 1963). 


[1] James T. Dennison Jr. (ed.), Reformed Confessions of the 16th and 17th Centuries in English Translation, vol. 1, 1523–1552 (Grand Rapids, MI, 2008). All page number references in the text are to this volume.

[2] See Augustine, Confessions (1. 1).

[3] St. Cyprian, De unit. 6: PL 4, 519.